More detailed information is provided
- in Bug "kern/128331: [agp] nForce3-250 AGP not detected correctly" :
- -> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/128331,
- at http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=Alivedual-esata2,
- at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NForce3 and http://www.nvidia.com/page/nf3.html,
- at http://www.matrox.com/graphics/de/products/graphics_cards/g_series/g550/.
My understanding of this motherboard is that
a) the "Northbridge": NVIDIA ( former ULi / ALi ) M1695 directly connects to the CPU via pcib0
as well as
b) the "Southbridge": NVIDIA nForce3 250 (including the AGP bridge) directly via pcib1
via their respective HyperTransport interfaces, each using 16 / 8 of the (up to 32) lane links in parallel.
IFF this understanding is correct, the finding in the bug report _could perhaps_ indicate a severe flaw in the logic of FreeBSD's kernel handling multiple host bridges and the corresponding assignment of (in principle, correctly detected) devices to their host bridges.
Otherwise I would be really glad for every hint to any misunderstanding on my side.
(I am exploiting Gentoo for years now, avoiding all the distro- & release-mania, but I am quite new to the 7.x FreeBSD kernel.)
Any kernel developer on this newly created forum (++ !) yet already ?
- in Bug "kern/128331: [agp] nForce3-250 AGP not detected correctly" :
- -> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/128331,
- at http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=Alivedual-esata2,
- at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NForce3 and http://www.nvidia.com/page/nf3.html,
- at http://www.matrox.com/graphics/de/products/graphics_cards/g_series/g550/.
My understanding of this motherboard is that
a) the "Northbridge": NVIDIA ( former ULi / ALi ) M1695 directly connects to the CPU via pcib0
as well as
b) the "Southbridge": NVIDIA nForce3 250 (including the AGP bridge) directly via pcib1
via their respective HyperTransport interfaces, each using 16 / 8 of the (up to 32) lane links in parallel.
IFF this understanding is correct, the finding in the bug report _could perhaps_ indicate a severe flaw in the logic of FreeBSD's kernel handling multiple host bridges and the corresponding assignment of (in principle, correctly detected) devices to their host bridges.
Otherwise I would be really glad for every hint to any misunderstanding on my side.
(I am exploiting Gentoo for years now, avoiding all the distro- & release-mania, but I am quite new to the 7.x FreeBSD kernel.)
Any kernel developer on this newly created forum (++ !) yet already ?