Pardon me for the essay :r.
drhowarddrfine said:
When you get to its core, all math is just addition and subtraction.
I have to disagree with you. Maybe it is so in the engineering waters, but it's not like that in general. To me the high enough level of mathematical abstraction with time becomes more like philosophy than merely '+' and '-'. What you're talking about is computing (e.g. applied mathematics, and crunching the numbers by hand), and not math (which is theoretical mathematics). Mathematics was also the last "science" that diverged from metaphysics with Georg Cantor and his classification of different "infinities" (see
cardinal and
ordinal numbers... it's amazing).
This philosophical view especially becomes apparent when you're dealing with "bleeding edge" physics, like Quantum Field Theory. You're introducing spaces that have a fraction or even real number of dimensions and you integrate over surfaces within them. How can you accept it in your heart that such a thing exists? Purists need more than just a physical proof. And if such objects do exist abstractly, how do we interpret its existence in the real world? Where does such an object exist? Does it exist in the world of ideas, or does it exist in the real world. Or maybe it's just an imperfect approximation of perfect abstract objects, that carry no such ambiguities. People have literally gone mad because of such questions! This isn't a joke! Read the excellent
Greek comic book Logicomix. Just think of the complex plane for a while and really really try to justify it in your mind.
fonz said:
In other words: thinking along the lines of "I suspect something, can I (dis)prove it?", "What would happen if I try this?", "Would that be possible?", that sort of thing. Basically, just "play" with math.
Yeah, that's how we're taught in our university -- every problem must be dealt with this hacker mentality. From physics to programming or whatever. And in my opinion this is the best approach. Let your own passion guide you.
However, I noticed that many great computer scientists have been great mathematicians as well (and vice-versa). Take Knuth for example, he made a contribution for example in
tetration function and power towers (and other things). Or John von Neumann -- a genius in fields of physics, mathematics and computer science. Feynman, awesome as he was, was wrong when he said that studying computers isn't a science, but still pushed on with quantum computers.
My skill at math fluctuated. Some things were really not my forte in primary school (like fractions, I actually failed an exam because of them... damn!) but now I am a fraction "guru"
(but compared to most mathematicians I suck big time! :r). So even if you sucked big time before, you might come to love the subject. I have friend from Germany, who used to be such a lazy person (and still is) and wanted to study economy or something, and failed the entry exams, so he had to enroll in physics, because there was no limit to students (or the criteria were very low at least) and there he found love in pure theoretical mathematics. He's done string theory, quantum gravitation and all those things. And all his life before it he was avoiding math too.