AI assistant for installation/post install configuration?

ChatGPT helped me a lot to (install) configure FreeBSD on my laptop. In general (according to my opinion), it would be nice to have a specifically trained AI assistant working here, knowing all the details written in the Handbook and on the blogs helping newcomers to smoothly install FreeBSD on their machines. This would be a great advantage, I think.
 
knowing all the details written in the Handbook
How about just following the Handbook? No other tools needed.
the blogs helping newcomers to smoothly install FreeBSD on their machines.
Other blogs tend to be the opposite and outdated but AI will religiously follow them.

You need only one source. The Handbook. Two sources if you include this forum. No installation needed.
 
Troll.
Witty username, restricted profile.
Comes on FreeBSD forum (the OS for tech people) and asks about AI built into the installer, a thing not even Windows or OSX has.
Puts Handbook in same sentence as "blogs".
 
You did bring the fireproof underwear, did you?
How big do you think the install media would have to be, to the next 10GB mark?
If it's a static database blob, it can be made torrent-based or some similar bandwidth-dividing system. I would donate to a project attempt for a local LLM without dependency on corporate services. That's just a bad idea. Something else will own everything you generate with it without 1 exception. Everything.

I have been thinking about a system that is given a list of storage devices and finds the fastest possible configuration for any available filesystem that uses them all. Maybe closer too deep learning than AI but it really should exist.
 
Looks like you're trying to install FreeBSD.
Would you like some help?
clippy.webp
 
Troll.
Witty username, restricted profile.
Comes on FreeBSD forum (the OS for tech people) and asks about AI built into the installer, a thing not even Windows or OSX has.
Puts Handbook in same sentence as "blogs".
It was absolutely not trolling at all. Just a curious idea of a "newcomer", who used FreeBSD last time around year 2000, and now tried it again, and happy to see how good is it.
 
Which part of the installation was troublesome for you? Because the FreeBSD installation itself is fairly straightforward.
I was wrong in stating the original entry. The installation was easy, the post install config was a bit harder than in Linux, but with the help of ChatGPT worked smoothly and fine. And this gave me the idea. But it seems that (according to the general opinion here) it would let the proles also use FreeBSD, what seems not to be a welcomed idea. But its OK for me, on my machines it works fine
:)
 
Which part of the installation was troublesome for you? Because the FreeBSD installation itself is fairly straightforward.
Post install config was much easier using AI help. Like sleep mode after laptop lid closure, changing keyboard lighting level, sound, usb phone internet connection, printing, things like this. Reading the handbook would take a days to manage, using AI it took one hour.
 
So, no AI "help" needed during the install 👍


I'd say it's easier to do on FreeBSD than Linux once you get the hang of it and have a bit more experience with the "FreeBSD-way" of doing things.
Yes, I made the initial statement wrong. Install was OK, configuration was easier using AI, not the handbook.
 
not the handbook.
Handbook is written fairly generically, it simply cannot provide instructions for all possible hardware combinations people might have. Helping new users is one of the reasons why these forums exist. But I get it, AI can be useful to look things up quickly. Just be wary, it can also get confusing when it mixes up Linux and FreeBSD solutions. It tends to do that.
 
As noted in another post this morning, AI can lead to false expectations. In https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/whats-real-stage-of-freebsd-now-a-weird-article.103195/

it led the Distrowatch editor to believe there was a preconfigured desktop environment option on the install.
But anyway, if you did want to use AI for help with it, there's a reasonable chance that it give you good answers. In my very humble opinion, I don't think it's worth the work to tie it to install media or instructions at this point. FreeBSD is fairly easy to install, just following the prompts. For edge cases, such as, for example, sharing a disk with Linux and using ZFS on the FreeBSD install a bit of web searching will probably get you just as good information as an included AI, and only take a little more work.

It's not that your idea is bad, in my opinion, it is just that there are limits to time, energy, etc., and said time and energy might be more usefully put into another channel. If you're, for example, having trouble installing, there's a good chance that there's someone here with the patience and time to anwer questions.
 
It would be better to incorporate Username Required's feedback in some way to improve the install process including issues people run into post-install (but without using AI). I mean we spend enough time helping new users here, often answering the same questions with some variations....
 
It would be better to incorporate Username Required's feedback in some way to improve the install process including issues people run into post-install (but without using AI). I mean we spend enough time helping new users here, often answering the same questions with some variations....
This is why I made this small description (using AI help) about post install config on Macs: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/freebsd-setup-notes-for-older-macbook-air-mac-systems.103181/
 
How about just following the Handbook? No other tools needed.
There's also sysutils/desktop-installer. Honestly, I don't see much point in making the setup any easier than it already is. Anybody who needs that last bit of handholding is probably not even thinking about FreeBSD to begin with. They may not even be considering a mainstream newbie focused Linux distro.

While it's not exactly exchangeable, addressing things like the driver situation where there are issues with it would be a much better use of time.
 
Back
Top