That is /usr/bin/openssl version above, correct?
That is interesting. Does freebsd-update IDS show files that don't match the expected hashes for 10.2-RELEASE-p7.
The _fib<number> syntax works for having a service start in a different FIB by the rc framework. For routes it would be rc.conf entries like below:
static_routes="dmzigb1"
route_dmzigb1="default 192.168.102.1 -fib 1"
I believe it saves it under /var/db/freebsd-update until you run the second freebsd-update install. My memory on this may be rusty however. Are you checking the file immediately after saving but before updating the userland?
What kind of filesystem? I was going to point out sysutils/testdisk (as pkg install testdisk on FreeBSD) as a recovery tool but it looks like it only supports partition operations with UFS and not file level recovery. If it's ZFS it's a whole other story but one where snapshots could save the day.
The technical background is explained in quintessence's link above. The end user visible aspect of this is you will have to ensure that the pgsql user's UID in each jail is unique rather than using the default of 70. Else with SysV IPC the different PostgreSQL databases all using 70 will...
That link may still be around in the years to come or it may not be. Do you mind showing your final configurations for future folks looking for the same solution?
The best way to find out is to dive in and do it! Try out an install CD and drop to a shell and see if all the hardware shows up in dmesg. Off hand the only iffy concern I would have is the Broadcom based Wifi as they aren't as well supported as the more open vendors. However the 802.11g may...
It's autofs as the service now; amd is the legacy automount daemon. That means it's sysrc autofs_enable=YES to enable and not sysrc amd_enable=YES.
Here's an example to remotely mount user home directories where several users on the system have their home directory pointed to /zfs/homedirs...
More specific information about "analyze incoming request" would be helpful. What do you care about? A layer 3 metric such as who the packet is destined for? A layer 4 metric such as the port it's going to? Or a layer 7 metric such as a specific application layer protocol. Performance is...
I'm on vacation and don't have a variety of systems to look at how they comply with standards but your description sounds worthy of a bug report. (https://bugs.FreeBSD.org/bugzilla/)
If I understand correctly, you have a Cisco 800 router acting as firewall that your ISP controls and is forwarding port 25 to a mail server.
If this is a mail server issue, information on what FreeBSD version is in use, information on the mail server software, and any mail server related logs...
If I read things correctly CSF looks like an iptables front end. The right answer is to ask DirectAdmin to add official FreeBSD support using native FreeBSD firewalls. Alternately as ondra_knezour mentioned above there are other alternatives that just may not cover your entire use case.
From the log for r399544 (https://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/changeset/ports/399544) it would seem that feature was turned back on recently. Also see 202128. If you are using 10.2-RELEASE with the default quarterly branch you will not have this update via a package just yet so would have to either...
I'm a bit lost. Can you show any commands you ran prior to this that led to the message you saw? security/openvpn doesn't depend on ImageMagick so I don't see how you can get in this state.
Stick to pf.conf man page on the system to ensure you get the most accurate information. There can be a mix if you look online and come across the mix of OpenBSD and FreeBSD info.
Ok. That makes sense. Is there anything left to cover? If we've covered everything I would appreciate you marking this solved ("thread tools" at the top right, "edit thread", add "solved"). Thanks!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
