I went full-time FreeBSD for a couple weeks. These are my takeaways.

Recently, Jupiter Broadcasting's main show had a week-long challenge where the hosts and many of the audience tried switching to a BSD for a week. While it seems that 2/3 of the hosts had a horrible time, I thought it was a fun and worthwhile experience and am keeping FreeBSD on one of my two workstations. I will say that I didn't get any other BSD to even boot, but that's not a conversation for here.

My full writeup is here:
 
For a serious effort (but that wouldn't do on screen) if you want to switch, the tryout period should be at least one month. A week is just playing a game.Just my 0.02 Eurocents.
 
I'm so very much confused by things like this. Also, I've seen terms like "Linux nerd" or "Linux poweruser" or "guru" or whatever but at the same time, the "requirements" are childish. -e.g. "install a package" or "start a service" or "install a ''container''". That label (those requirements attached to it) seem so very demeaning! Please stop using that label--if those are the requirements to obtain that level--for yourself or others (in either Linux or BSD none of those requirements should be unattainable in very little time and I have confidence you can be far above that in no time). As far as I could tell, a few hours reading the handbook (for any of the BSDs) would have gotten you to "level 11" in one shot.

Oh, and stop trying to find the equal of X on Y. Pick a task and find the section in the handbook (-i.e. don't try to find "sysctl" in the handbook; find "service management"). "connect to the internet", "install a desktop", "service management", etc.
 
I stopped reading at
"I don’t want to use FreeBSD on that one, being that it’s the Ubuntu of the BSD world"
Yeah, that made me cringe too. I believe this is just another example of the user trying to associate a Linux-ism to BSD; or at least this is what I told myself - the assumption, on my part, is that the user is saying Ubuntu "has everything you need". Anyone who's read a BSD's handbook for more than 5 minutes knows that's not how BSD works but...*shrug*

I'm sure, I'm wrong in my assumption, just based on the fact the user keeps doing odd things like:
1. #!/usr/local/bin/bash
2. sudo
...
Because that would take an actual effort to install 'bash' and 'sudo' vs just use the given shell and su (especially for a 'test'). o.0

And what dahell is "tailscale"?
 
Jupiter Broadcasting
Am I supposed to know what or who that is?
I didn't get any other BSD to even boot
That doesn't say much about your skills, I'm afraid.
While it seems that 2/3 of the hosts had a horrible time, I thought it was a fun and worthwhile experience
They can ask for their money back, and I'm utterly unmoved by your positive opinion. We don't need your approval here.
I stopped reading at
"I don’t want to use FreeBSD on that one, being that it’s the Ubuntu of the BSD world"
I didn't start reading. I'm a bad person.
 
I'm the guru of the flies, but only in the summer.

Additionally, I wonder how these unknown people to whom the OP belongs didn't try GhostBSD, which seems the perfect fit for their lack of technical acumen.
I think the write up mentioned that GhostBSD would have been "cheating" in the challenge. However, I think it comes down to the two different types of people; those that read the manual and those that don't. ...Me: if I purchase a chainsaw, for the most part, the trigger is fairly self-explanatory but when I need to assemble a bicycle, the first thing I reach for is the manual.
 
Dear John, I think this is unfair. The division I would make is those who get things done and those who don't. I for one try to read as little as possible to do what I need to do. If I can read zero, I read zero. If I need to read a lot, I read a lot.
Isn't that how my chainsaw/bicycle analogy came across? -i.e. sometimes i think it's necessary to slow down to go fast.
 
Back
Top