Looking at the mailing list, I think they are deciding what "shot" is the correct one. So far two things:1984 all over again? Friggin' enough babysitting and nannying - until you discover just how many users don't know how to think critically, in their own best interests, and actually need somebody to step in and call the shots for them...
![]()
I lean toward the later because I am not developer, not distribution architect or such.I lean towards the latter because find Linux an utter mess.
Do you know which mailing list and month by chance? I checked hackers, and current for march and have not been able to find it so far.Looking at the mailing list, I think they are deciding what "shot" is the correct one. So far two things:
I lean towards the latter because find Linux an utter mess. However as people flee Linux, they do take the mindset with them which is why FreeBSD may just become a kernel in future if things keep getting stripped.
- Overly modularise and reduce things. Typical developer mindset which creates DIY Linux-like platforms rather than operating systems.
- Maintain the status quo which accrues cruft and legacy
Much of the relevant emails are linked to via the post here.Do you know which mailing list and month by chance? I checked hackers, and current for march and have not been able to find it so far.
Hm, no one has addressed Lehey's question. Maybe they took the discussion to a private channel.As the response to that states, possibly its worth discussing with the OpenBSD guys why they themselves don't see it fit for removal in an OS focused on security. Hopefully he does and they have some good insight.