rbranco Yesterday at 4:15 PM #1 A security model for systemd Linux has many security features and tools that have evolved over the years to address threats [...] lwn.net
A security model for systemd Linux has many security features and tools that have evolved over the years to address threats [...] lwn.net
cy@ Developer Yesterday at 5:45 PM #3 I don't agree with Pottering on almost all issues but on the issue that Linux security being a dog's breakfast, I totally agree.
I don't agree with Pottering on almost all issues but on the issue that Linux security being a dog's breakfast, I totally agree.
RetroComputingCollector Yesterday at 5:57 PM #4 cy@ said: I don't agree with Pottering on almost all issues but on the issue that Linux security being a dog's breakfast, I totally agree. Click to expand... Linux is just a mess in general. GNU/Linux feels like a hobby OS/proof-of-concept that someone posted on github.
cy@ said: I don't agree with Pottering on almost all issues but on the issue that Linux security being a dog's breakfast, I totally agree. Click to expand... Linux is just a mess in general. GNU/Linux feels like a hobby OS/proof-of-concept that someone posted on github.
OP rbranco Yesterday at 6:06 PM Thread Starter #5 mer said: This has to be the most disturbing thing I've heard today. Click to expand... LOL I had a bit of trouble finding the proper title for this but I'm a bit old to care about it so I went along anyway.
mer said: This has to be the most disturbing thing I've heard today. Click to expand... LOL I had a bit of trouble finding the proper title for this but I'm a bit old to care about it so I went along anyway.
cracauer@ Developer Today at 12:40 AM #6 Well, Linux has quite a few mitigation mechanisms in the kernel, many more than FreeBSD (without capsicum). The problem is that applications don't use them, respectively don't make an effort to be able to operate under those (useful) constraints. Security Documentation — The Linux Kernel documentation ETA: better link https://www.linux.com/training-tutorials/overview-linux-kernel-security-features/
Well, Linux has quite a few mitigation mechanisms in the kernel, many more than FreeBSD (without capsicum). The problem is that applications don't use them, respectively don't make an effort to be able to operate under those (useful) constraints. Security Documentation — The Linux Kernel documentation ETA: better link https://www.linux.com/training-tutorials/overview-linux-kernel-security-features/
atax1a Today at 12:46 AM #7 nothing to add to this discussion except for the following: pennart loettering
OP rbranco Today at 9:33 AM Thread Starter #8 cracauer@ said: Well, Linux has quite a few mitigation mechanisms in the kernel, many more than FreeBSD (without capsicum). Click to expand... They're not particularly easy to use and they're all optional, so they turn to external sandboxing mechanisms like container runtimes.
cracauer@ said: Well, Linux has quite a few mitigation mechanisms in the kernel, many more than FreeBSD (without capsicum). Click to expand... They're not particularly easy to use and they're all optional, so they turn to external sandboxing mechanisms like container runtimes.
lwn.net
