Intelligent life.

It's a simple numbers game. We are not alone, period. The chances are almost 100% that we are not alone in this galaxy, even better with all the galaxies in the visible universe. But would we even recognize intelligence when we see it? Would it recognize us? Would we even meet? Just look at this, you get the idea. And any civilization which can do FTL, if at all possible, will be so much advanced that we have no clue what they do. So anyone talking about UFOs being disassembled in Area51 and the technology reproduced can think about how the scientists of, say 1950 would go about a mobile phone from today. And remember that the phone will (possibly) have means to generate energy to level a continent. On the other side of earth.

To them, we may simply belong in a cage since we keep hitting each other and poop all over our place. Or we are filmed for the comedy value, that would also make sense.
 
Hopefully on a more humerous note, let us just hope that the plasma physicist (aka, rocket scientist, he's clearly a genuinely clever chap) Dr John Brandenburg is completely and utterly wrong in the conclusions he has drawn from his isotopic analysis of Mars' atmosphere. Whatever would it mean if he is correct?


Here is the latest version of his paper that I could find.


I'm not even going to mention what he calls 'the archaeology'. See, I didn't mention it, did I? 😁
 
But current opinion is that the last time there was an ocean on Mars, with running water in rivers, was billions of years ago, at the time of the early earth. Of course there is no real proof of these theories, they are educated best-guesses based on the very limited amount of investigation of Mars that we have been able to do so far. However as far as we know, Mars has been very dry, very cold, with little atmosphere and no global magnetic field to protect it from the solar wind, and having no life, for billions of years. Europa is probably a better chance for the discovery of water-based life (around hydrothermal vents in a suspected subsurface ocean).



And for Elon, if he's reading this, you would stand a much higher chance of building a new human civilsation in Antarctica than on Mars, if you had the choice; say, if you had developed working fusion power and were able to start agriculture using artificial energy and light. But Mars.... nooooo, that's really a long shot.
 
Titan has lakes of hydrocarbon
If there is anything living there, it would be a very different type of life to anything we know of. The chemistry of liquid methane doesn't help you much if you want to get life as we know it going.

 
Supposedly it rains iron on exoplanet WASP-76B. Now thats gotta hurt! Let's see Mando get out of that one. It's 640 light years away...

 
Why are there only three spatial dimensions and only one time dimension?

Perhaps it is only our perception, and through a fourth dimension they are nearer to us.
 
Whatever would it mean if he is correct?
He is not - that was the shadows burying some ships there.

Ok, seriously, why use thermonuclear devices to kill a planet when some nearby asteroids will do just fine? Also, you get plausible deniability.
We know what earth had to digest in the past, and the impact in yucatan is by no way the biggest we had. Yet here we are. Or even because of it, or would we have proper plate tectonics without the theia collision? Now our civilization is too complex and intervined to survive even a small thing like yucatan. But life? That will.
 
You've been reading E E Doc Smith, I see. And it occurred to me, why would someone drop hydrogen bombs on the northern part of Mars to wipe out a civilisation in the southern hemisphere at Cydonia having what he calls a 'primitive culture similar to ancient Egypt'? Unless Sutekh was actually imprisoned in the pyramid there after all? Yeah, none of it stacks up. :)

The isotopic analysis part of his argument is quite interesting though, he says that is weapons signature. Well... perhaps it is weapons signature, within humans' limited experience of the universe so far. We don't know everything...
 
They tried to collaps the Noctis Labyrinth for sure.

But back to the topic. First, we would need to define what "intelligence" is. Any takers?
 
That's a tough one. Bacteria exhibit some of the features of intelligence, for example, and they have comms technology too. Perhaps Alain gave us a trick question! 😁

I think for me the interesting question is "is there life on other planets that has developed a technology that would allow them to communicate with us or to visit us?"
It's also the scariest question... and perhaps also the most hopeful.
 
Why are there only three spatial dimensions and only one time dimension?

Perhaps it is only our perception, and through a fourth dimension they are nearer to us.
In pretty much all of physics, if the number of dimensions is different from 3+1 (spatial and time), things completely fall apart, and all our physical models break. This is true of everything from the geometry that the Greeks and Egyptians were already doing, to general relativity (which includes gravity as a subset), and quantum field theory (which has means the standard model of particles, which includes quantum mechanics as a subset).

(Side remark: String theory is often expressed as a model that operates in 10 or 11 dimensions, but those extra dimensions are "rolled up" by the Kaluza-Klein theory, and are inaccessible at energies below a threshold, which is far away from anything we've ever experienced or seen or have any way to measure (even indirectly). And note that our experience is now reaching very high energies, for example with the 200 PeV neutrino detected in the mediterranean recently. So these extra dimensions are guaranteed to be non-interacting with the physics that determines our daily life and our cosmology, perhaps except a fraction of second after the big bang.)

Is there a way to directly measure that we have 3.0 +- 0.1 spatial dimensions? Not easily, because the mathematical model is so closely built around using that. We can very accurately measure the number of quark species (from the hadronic R in e+e- colliders), and the number of neutrino flavors (from the decay width of the Z0 boson). The best experimental proof of the number of spatial dimensions comes somewhat indirectly, from the equipartition theorem of statistical mechanics (itself a close relative of the virial theorem), which correctly predicts the ideal gas law (with the famous factor of 3/2 k T, where the 3 is the number of dimensions, and k is Boltzman's constant), and the heat capacity of solids (I forgot the exact name for that law, might be Dulang-Petit). The argument behind that is that a molecule in an ideal gas has a certain number of "degrees of freedom" (ways it can move), and the amount of energy in each of the degrees of freedom will be the same, so by measuring the molecules kinetic energy (which is an aspect of the gases temperature) you get the number of dimensions it can move. So indeed, any experiment in thermodynamics that involves a gas pretty much measures that the number of spatial dimensions is 3.

Obviously, we can create theories (better called "science fiction") that have more dimensions, and we can hypothesize that space aliens have ways to access those extra dimensions. But such ideas are wholly outside the realm of experimental physics, and are more a branch of literature and social criticism.
 
The best experimental proof of the number of spatial dimensions comes somewhat indirectly, from the equipartition theorem of statistical mechanics ...
That is not a better proof than the daily experience of having three degrees of freedom. We can say it is evident. My point was: is this not due only to our perception?

Experimental physics does not help here: it is built from the perception. And mathematical theory also not: it is immanent.
 
If I wanna do time traveling, all I have to do is fly between KIX and SEA (or NRT-SFO, or SYD-LAX). Direction is important, and if I fly with the wind, I can outrace this planet and arrive earlier than I left. It will take non-artificial intelligence to see the sarcastic humor in this.
 
Back
Top