in future ( undefined, but i would take paper notes with me ), i plan to make fresh install, manually, with shell, hence the questions regarding pool naming and dataset layout choice.
usually poolname/ROOT/default dataset is used for system installed ( mounted as "/" ). other that some certain datasets and mountpoint used by default bsdinstall, which, i believe are well thought, but i would like to have simpler scheme. idea is to have poolname parent dataset, then poolname/system mounted as "/", where installation would be, perhaps, poolname/usr and poolname/var would be separate mountpoints. idea is to avoid complex names, such as root or ROOT words in dataset naming. would it work or make sense? would it be then possible for bectl to handle such layout? i will write down suggestions on paper
P.S. sorry for the lack of formatting in required places, i am on mobile phone, and have no internet due to very well known reasons. it is hard for me to modify text.
usually poolname/ROOT/default dataset is used for system installed ( mounted as "/" ). other that some certain datasets and mountpoint used by default bsdinstall, which, i believe are well thought, but i would like to have simpler scheme. idea is to have poolname parent dataset, then poolname/system mounted as "/", where installation would be, perhaps, poolname/usr and poolname/var would be separate mountpoints. idea is to avoid complex names, such as root or ROOT words in dataset naming. would it work or make sense? would it be then possible for bectl to handle such layout? i will write down suggestions on paper
P.S. sorry for the lack of formatting in required places, i am on mobile phone, and have no internet due to very well known reasons. it is hard for me to modify text.