Upgrading from Perl 5.8.9 to Perl 5.22, the version reported by
The documentation also reflects v5.8.9.
I previously posted a problem regarding libutil.so.7 not found
As I explained in the post, I found the .7 version of the object and copied it to the FreeBSD v10.1 system.
Notice the process that completed on June 5 about thirty minutes past midnight. It also appears in the /usr/local/lib/perl5 directory as v5.22/perl. Curiously, the old version 5.8.9 was touched yesterday afternoon Jun 4 around 16:42 hrs.
The port installation apparently built from the v5.22 code, but where does the reported v5.8.9 come from. Could the port compile that relied on the libutil.so.7 object introduce this discrepancy?
perl -v looks incorrect. See the following:
Code:
# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.9 built for i386-freebsd-64int
(with 1 registered patch, see perl -V for more detail)
Copyright 1987-2008, Larry Wall
Perl may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License or the
GNU General Public License, which may be found in the Perl 5 source kit.
Complete documentation for Perl, including FAQ lists, should be found on
this system using "man perl" or "perldoc perl". If you have access to the
Internet, point your browser at http://www.perl.org/, the Perl Home Page.
I previously posted a problem regarding libutil.so.7 not found
As I explained in the post, I found the .7 version of the object and copied it to the FreeBSD v10.1 system.
Code:
. . .found
/usr/bin/perl
/usr/local/bin/perl
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/perl
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.22/perl
/usr/local/lib/pidgin/perl
root@bravo:/usr/local/lib/perl5 # ls -lsah
total 52
4 drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512B Jun 5 00:33 .
32 drwxr-xr-x 60 root wheel 31K Jun 4 21:54 ..
4 drwxr-xr-x 54 root wheel 2.5K Jun 5 00:34 5.22
4 drwxr-xr-x 42 root wheel 3.0K Jun 4 16:42 5.8.9
4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512B Jun 4 16:42 i386-freebsd-64int
4 drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512B Jun 5 00:33 site_perl
The port installation apparently built from the v5.22 code, but where does the reported v5.8.9 come from. Could the port compile that relied on the libutil.so.7 object introduce this discrepancy?
)