- Thread Starter
- #126
rtsold and unbound is in it
It isn't bad logic but the reason why Samba is not in base as a data server is because we already have one. NFS(d) as a data server.But if I follow that logic, then Samba should be in base
I personally consider freebsd containing old stuff like ed , like sendmail, or like csh.
Why not remove them or move them to optional ports. We live in the year 2019 after all ?
I get brain damage just looking at that video.Go head - it is surely safe.
I get brain damage just looking at that video.
Well the main purpose of BSD 4.3 was to serve early Internet and Intranet Infrastructure. FreeBSD as it's successor has all the daemons to serve all basic app protocols (DNS, SMTP, NTP, FTP so on) out of the box. NFS was used to boot diskless systems mostly in campuses if I recall right so it was important too. As http became popular a little bit later, it's not included in base. The same and for SAMBA. And don't forget about license, e.g. GPL has restrictions to include GPL licensed source code to non-GPL distributionsBut if I follow that logic, then Samba should be in base (it is after all just a data server, for the CIFS a.k.a. SMB protocol), and that's pretty ridiculous, since setting up Samba is actually not common, and pretty hard.
can't be more than 3.6 röntgenI get brain damage just looking at that video.