http://svnweb.freebsd.org
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd
i've heard two stories: freebsd preferrs cvs and github will rule. is someone trying to "push" github (and whoever registered the freebsd git source) as the "official maintainers"?
------------------------
WHY: i'm familiar with linux CHANGELOG but not freeBSD kernel changelog. i'd like to compare the two. to do that i need to find the (changelog or the freeBSD equivalent) for kernel source code patches.
Any comments on "how stable" changes are to either kernel are also welcome. (ex, i know in linux bugs are frequent (rather, lack of knowlege + bugs), and that many fixes are reverted and refixed. is freeBSD any different in that respect? that's what i'm looking for). are some of the "changelog signers" working on both kernels?
any other comments on freeBSD v. linux kernel are welcome. i'm mostly interested in "what goes wrong" with signed changes and who's signing them.
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd
i've heard two stories: freebsd preferrs cvs and github will rule. is someone trying to "push" github (and whoever registered the freebsd git source) as the "official maintainers"?
------------------------
WHY: i'm familiar with linux CHANGELOG but not freeBSD kernel changelog. i'd like to compare the two. to do that i need to find the (changelog or the freeBSD equivalent) for kernel source code patches.
Any comments on "how stable" changes are to either kernel are also welcome. (ex, i know in linux bugs are frequent (rather, lack of knowlege + bugs), and that many fixes are reverted and refixed. is freeBSD any different in that respect? that's what i'm looking for). are some of the "changelog signers" working on both kernels?
any other comments on freeBSD v. linux kernel are welcome. i'm mostly interested in "what goes wrong" with signed changes and who's signing them.