Once again this is the excellent use case for a static compile. Don't pollute pfSense.
Why not SSH in and grab your files? sysutils/gigolo works line WinSCP.
LABEL Clonezilla
MENU LABEL Clonezilla
TEXT HELP
Backup and Restore Program
ENDTEXT
kernel images/clonezilla/live/vmlinuz
append initrd=images/clonezilla/live/initrd.img boot=live username=user union=overlay components noswap noprompt vga=788 keyboard-layouts=en locales=en_GB.UTF-8 fetch=http://192.168.1.11/images/clonezilla/live/filesystem.squashfs
You've been around long enough to be well aware of this: PC-BSD, FreeNAS, NAS4Free, and all other FreeBSD DerivativesI would like to install something on pfSense
In fairness, it was about a lightweight webserver and the question only mentioned pfSense in passing and did ask for advice regarding pfSense.You've been around long enough to be well aware of this: PC-BSD, FreeNAS, NAS4Free, and all other FreeBSD Derivatives
pfsense has a tftp server available in the gui package manager. can you get away with fetch=tftp://192.168.1.11/images/clonezilla/live/filesystem.squashfs ?
In reality pf does not care what application needs port 80. So you should be safe there, but 2 webservers on the same port?
That's not feasible so then you need to change the default port of your secondary webserver. pf should still be fine.
Outside calls will be blocked. Inside will work.
I just think it's bad network hygene to run 2 webservers on a firewall.
Thanks, never thought of that but will give it a try. I was simply copying instructions from somewhere without thinking about alternatves.
Sometimes when you've spent so much time trying to get something to work, you're scared of breaking it.With clonezilla the option line is so long that it is easy to make mistakes.