Just some wallpapers in 1920x1080.
Gods — are not comics heroes, to like them or not They are kinds of power, which you're able to conduct into the world. IMO it is much better to represent the power of enlightenment, consciousness, knowledge, destruction of ignorance and love, than power of "death, time and doomsday", because if you'll represent such powers, you'll be f*cked up, sooner or later. Also we're comming into the new Aeon, new Era, the vibrations of our planet are rising with each month and even day, so if you will spend old low level vibration things into the world, our planet will get rid of you, because your activity will interfere planet to increase its vibrations.I'm more of a fan of Kali, Goddess of Death, Time and Doomsday.
I'm more of a fan of Xena, princess - warrior She got big, tight ass.What about Wonder Woman?
It is not a "wallpaper", but it is in good resolution, so it is possible to print this poster of Lord Shiva in every typography even in A0 format. It's looking great in A0 with glossy photo paper, BTW, it shouldn't be too expensive.
michael_hackson png is lossless which means it cannot be compressed. The variations for creating a high quality image, such as a photo, would create a huge png image. jpeg, otoh, can be compressed. While you would be losing quality using a jpeg, a png image for a photo could be far too large to be practical. It depends on the image.
jpg was developed by NASA to transmit graphics across space without losing too much image quality. In a setting where viewers might be viewing the image over limited bandwidth, I'll use a jpg. I use png for my wallpaper because they do not have to be uncompressed and I'm not pressed for diskspace.So having a picture in png and downscaling it to proper size would not generate any better quality than having it as jpg?
Don't try to mix apples with oranges. If you have a slow fade in an image, png needs a data word for each and every pixel in that image. jpeg can reproduce the image with just one data word which would be an average of those four pixels. With png, that image might be a hard 16MB while, with jpeg, you can achieve acceptable viewing with 1MB but you can probably make it work with less.So having a picture in png and downscaling it to proper size would not generate any better quality than having it as jpg?
I've just posted it in best quality, in which I originally found this image, so I didn't change any quality options.If quality is of most importance isn't png the better format over jpg?
Interesting. Never heard that. The version of history I know is that JPEG is fundamentally nothing but discrete cosine transforms, which were developed by IBM in the 70s and 80s, and patented by them.jpg was developed by NASA to transmit graphics across space without losing too much image quality.
jpg was developed by NASA to transmit graphics across space without losing too much image quality.
I was incorrect and was passing on something I had not verified. Sorry.Interesting. Never heard that. The version of history I know is that JPEG is fundamentally nothing but discrete cosine transforms, which were developed by IBM in the 70s and 80s, and patented by them.
God of Sun, Son of Svarog — Dazhbog. Literally "Dazhbog" ("Дажьбог" or "Даждьбог") may be translated as "Giving God". He is God of fertility, happiness and love. Try to comunicate with Sun not just like with some kind of "star", but like with real personality, but not with words, with your thoughts. Soon you'll find out, that you knew Sun when you was little kid, then, with years, you just forgot about it, but in fact Sun is your best friend since the beginning of time and you love Sun very much.