Something I would like to know is if FreeBSD disagrees with the FSF or it is simply a matter of licensing not to use tools such as GCC, Bash among many by default, I really do not understand it because if GCC like Bash is free software and open source like Tcsh, csh or ksh
I suppose it must be because of being more independent of the GNU software and using more permissive licenses to obtain better results because the licenses with copyleft do not think that they are very attractive to the developers of BSD systems, for my part I think that and the truth I do not like copyleft licenses because more is that the software remains free and open source software do not depart much from a dictatorship or a sect besides permissive licenses such as the BSD with its 3 versions, the MIT license or Apache offers you everything that licenses with copyleft and more debauchery which I like very much and I think that BSD developers do not think very differently.
I suppose it must be because of being more independent of the GNU software and using more permissive licenses to obtain better results because the licenses with copyleft do not think that they are very attractive to the developers of BSD systems, for my part I think that and the truth I do not like copyleft licenses because more is that the software remains free and open source software do not depart much from a dictatorship or a sect besides permissive licenses such as the BSD with its 3 versions, the MIT license or Apache offers you everything that licenses with copyleft and more debauchery which I like very much and I think that BSD developers do not think very differently.