Earlier in the year when FreeBSD 9.1 was just being released, I excitedly got to work building a new development server. A couple months ago, I rebuilt my gateway server with a clean 9.1 image, although re-installing several times while testing various things in a fresh new environment.
In both situations, I found myself utilizing the last step of the installation to drop into a shell and running
But what seems strange is why this action isn't at minimum a built-in selection within the installation process. Once the network is configured, here's the option to update your system to the current version. Logic required for matching point and version releases may be required, perhaps optionally to include new point and version releases as a legitimate immediate upgrade.
Anyway, you see where I'm going with this. To new users especially, the manual step to freebsd-update is not an obvious one. It is important though...right? Thoughts, ideas, corrections?
In both situations, I found myself utilizing the last step of the installation to drop into a shell and running
freebsd-update
to immediately receive all updates. It seemed perfectly logical to me that this should be the absolute first action of any internet-capable system.But what seems strange is why this action isn't at minimum a built-in selection within the installation process. Once the network is configured, here's the option to update your system to the current version. Logic required for matching point and version releases may be required, perhaps optionally to include new point and version releases as a legitimate immediate upgrade.
Anyway, you see where I'm going with this. To new users especially, the manual step to freebsd-update is not an obvious one. It is important though...right? Thoughts, ideas, corrections?