Fun with Math

If all parties are in synchronous agreement of a quantum observation, then the quantum event will occur; however, if there is a disagreement, then the quantum event may be skewed towards partial or non-existence. "If you are looking for bad shit to happen, it's going to happen. Anybody being negative will mess up your chances when they are within your environment."

All events must be observed and accepted to be experienced.

So, we affect each other and all things around us.

Ponder upon this for a moment with regard to the two previous posts and put what you perceive into an objective perspective.

Now, consider that our actions and reactions will always coincide with the quantum meta-reality of the omniverse.

Apply Kant's concept of "mine" and "thine" to any [observed/perceiving] being in the omniverse.

Bring this back to your observed reality - or world view - with knowledge of Einstein's theory of relativity.

Time flows at different speeds in an environment. The speed of light is affected by the gravitational pull of all objects in the universe. It is possible for one to move "faster" than the "speed" of light when the flow of time is independent for the observer and light is affected by gravity.

The observation of the speed of light only applies to a vacuum and does not take into consideration other environmental factors.

In probability and statistics, the standard deviation only exists for a given set and not for all objects.

Probability is biased when it is not stated in absolute terms. The same goes for any theory that does not take all parts of the omniverse into consideration.

Pan out on this one and know that human knowledge is extremely limited and so is our experience as a species.
 
Corrections:
LaTex not Lua.
There is no limit on the formulas used. [(Value)(Operand)(Value)] and 0 may be used to reverse or to complete a formula. Division by zero is not allowed. No cheating.

Interesting way of approaching a problem, no?
 
sossego said:
Weight is the measurement of gravitational force upon an object due to the density of the mass of the greater object. If the object is a "black hole" then the item will weigh much more because of the forces acting upon it. Let's say that we live on a planet with a thin atmosphere and a honeycomb like structure - bear with me - we would weigh less than on a planet whose core was composed of lead due to the density of that object. Also, the further you are away from the center of the gravitational pull, the less force exerted which means the weight is less. Mass always remains the same.
Click to expand...

Umm, as your planet grows bigger (thus further from the center of gravity) your weight would increase
- standing on Jupiter [where it becomes dense enough not to sink] would be bad for your legs (not that this would be your biggest issue). Standing on a solid lead planet the size of say a house would require a tether to hold you down.

It's the mass of the other body and distance from the surface rather then density and distance from the center that matters more (even if it's a neutron star the size of a tennis ball). Your honeycomb planet, if it were the size of our sun, would tend to make one rather pancake-ish.
 
Density and other things. Life has important things for me to do. I will come back to you ontbis later.
 
Okay. Gravity also has a basis on the density of the object. A neutron star would have a higher gravitational pull than a planet made of Styrofoam. The honeycomb example would have less of a gravitational force because it has less mass; unless, of course, the mass is more dense than usual.
There is space between and within each atom, molecule, and sub atomic particles. There is a a book named The Holographic Universe which gives a good description of where and what things are composed of in reality.

A unified theory of everything, you say?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top