Search results

No firewall on that machine.

Hi I'm running FreeBSD xxx 8.1-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 #0: Sun Oct 3 11:56:28 CEST 2010 i386 GENERIC kernel with CARP module. It runs haproxy to balance several sorts of things, mostly SSL connections. Starting from refused connections to the clients, I sniffed the net and found...

It is what I was thinking about: recompiling is not a practical option in my setup. Thanks for the reply.

Ok, so if I understand correctly the version that comes out from the installation DVD (RELEASE) receives security fixes. To have BINARY upgrades also for "generic" fixes, like the ZFS ones, I should switch to STABLE. The second question now is, since I cannot use freebsd-update to "upgrade" to...

Hi I found a problem in 9.0 with ZFS and also found a patch to correct it. The patch is http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_sid.h.patch and is from some month ago. Today I upgraded to 9.0p1 and expected a patched zfs.ko to download, including that patch and others I've seen. It didn't...

I referred the patch to allow for case reproduction, I read the discussion and what it was about to fix. Also, in that case the problem was easy to reproduce, in my case I had a test box running overly stressed for days with no hassle, when two real user connected the box was gone in less than a...

I'm not a benchmark geek and use variuos Solaris too. Also in my opinion Solaris is somewhat faster, but not having any number and considering different hardware, I just can't say. My first consideration in using ZFS is affordability and flexibility. Doing single zfs send|receive using mbuffer...

Done, thanks.

Could you direct me? Never done before but I would like to help.

The zvols are in the same pool as other datasets. Cannot export without disrupting service... Really disappointed with current implementation of ZFS on FreeBSD. I was in hurry to migrate my Solaris boxes, but I think I should remain there for some time. This and other bugs (see my other posts)...

uname is: FreeBSD -snip- 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 zfs is 4 for non zvols, my zvol is NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE mypool/iscsi0 version -...

To elaborate a bit: mbuffer or not the zvol is transferred, but a corresponding /dev/zvol/mypool/iscsi0device does not show up until reboot.

I used zfs send -I mypool/iscsi0@20120415 mypool/iscsi0@20120416 | ssh root@bckserver zfs receive -v cloned/iscsi0 To be precise I piped it into mbuffer, as I usually do, but also tried without mbuffer and the result is just the same.

I don't use -R, it is not needed in my cfg. I transfer delta snapshot using -I, why should I use -R? Also I'm used to work on [Open]Solaris, and when I transfer the snapshot (with the very same script) I normally find it on the receiving side. I just can't think of the reboot being "by design".

Yes I did. I made some test with my 350Gb zvols, then started with something more manageable. On the first transfer, the zvol does not exist on the destination, it is created on receive, so no rollback problems.

The problem is not with the iscsi target itself, istgt says it cannot find /dev/zvol/mypool/iscsi0, and this is correct since the path /dev/zvol does not exist. I had to reboot to have the path appear. After that the iscsi target found the vol with no problems. Sure I don't want to reboot...

Hi, Running FreeBSD snip 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0 AMD64. I have a ZVOL with snapshots. When I try to rollback to the last snapshot, the operation lasts forever, no rollback is performed, and top shows ZFS in STOP state. Any ideas? Bye

Hi Using FreeBSD xxx 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0 AMD64 I did a zfs send of a ZVOL from a machine to another one. The transfer went ok, but on the receiving machine (with no other ZVOLs present) the /dev/zvol path was not present. If I create a new ZVOL the path appears, then I delete...

Hi I moved from an OpenSolaris box to FreeBSD to serve files from a ZFS pool. Very very bad idea. I'm using FreeBSD -snip- 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0. AMD64 First of all I recompiled the ZFS module with the patch to avoid panicing on ls -la. It mounted the volumes ok and upgraded...

I wrote it in #3. It does not matter if I use bytes or some suffix. Further tests indicate I can only create a 1G fs, not smaller, not bigger.... The same on two IBM AMD64 servers, installed with "next->next->next" procedure. If I install a system from the same ISO in a VM with 1G of RAM, I...