- Thread Starter
- #151
Are there websites who need spoofing ?
yes. www.nowtv.it works only if Sec-Ch-Ua-Platform = "Windows" ; it reports "browser not supported" if it detects "Linux".
Are there websites who need spoofing ?
Yeah, lots of US-based sites requireAre there websites who need spoofing ?
User Agent
-based spoofing, too. I'm under impression that the reason they stick with that nonsense mechanism is because it's too much work to get rid of it, so they're not gonna bother. Yeah, lots of US-based sites requireUser Agent
-based spoofing, too. I'm under impression that the reason they stick with that nonsense mechanism is because it's too much work to get rid of it, so they're not gonna bother.
Code:% pkg provides bin/chrome$ Name : chromium-122.0.6261.111 Comment : Google web browser based on WebKit Repo : FreeBSD-ports Filename: usr/local/bin/chrome %
The running application presents itself as Chromium.
Sec-Ch-Ua: "Google Chrome";v="123", "Not:A-Brand";v="8", "Chromium";v="123"
Sec-Ch-Ua-Mobile: ?0
Sec-Ch-Ua-Full-Version: "123.0.6312.58"
Sec-Ch-Ua-Arch: "x86"
Sec-Ch-Ua-Platform: "Linux"
Sec-Ch-Ua-Platform-Version: "6.5.0"
Sec-Ch-Ua-Model: ""
Sec-Ch-Ua-Bitness: "64"
Sec-Ch-Ua-Full-Version-List: "Google Chrome";v="123.0.6312.58", "Not:A-Brand";v="8.0.0.0", "Chromium";v="123.0.6312.58"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/53.0
a different user agent switcher extension. I tried this one :
How to Change the User Agent in Google Chrome
Many advanced Chrome users may occasionally need to change the user agent associated with the browser, typically for testing purposes. Whether you’re a designer, developer, student, tinkerer,…osxdaily.com
New Chrome in ports, with security fixes.
Strange, why isn't it in 14 latest?
All 2024-Apr-01 04:15
...
packagesite.pkg 2024-Apr-01 03:17
You do have a pretty old CPU here, a 4th gen i7. Current gen is 14th, and a lot of people are at least on 10th. Newer stuff is faster, because it does have different circuitry designs. Dunno how far ahead you can upgrade your CPU without needing to upgrade the mobo and everything else, but probably not very far, a 6th gen would be optimistic. Beyond that, the CPU just would not physically fit into the socket.Not fully related, but I'm surprised by the length of the build, which in my case is over 16 hours.
The machine is an Intel Core i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz with 32Gb RAM, 16Gb of swap.
Any ideas on how to make it faster?
Gosh, I didn't realize how old it is! That's the beauty of FreeBSD though: old hardware but it's still rocking like a teen!You do have a pretty old CPU here, a 4th gen i7. Current gen is 14th, and a lot of people are at least on 10th. Newer stuff is faster, because it does have different circuitry designs. Dunno how far ahead you can upgrade your CPU without needing to upgrade the mobo and everything else, but probably not very far, a 6th gen would be optimistic. Beyond that, the CPU just would not physically fit into the socket.
I normally plan for overnight jobs in such situations. Just start the compilation and go to sleep. Wake up, you can think straight after adequate sleep, and check on the progress.
You could try :www/chromium failed (pictured).
Using package build records at pkg-status.freebsd.org
https://people.freebsd.org/~grahamperrin/pkg-status/ This brief guide includes: screenshots an explanation of why the latest option – not to be confused with packages from the main branch of the ports tree (familiarly known as latest) – is not reliable a hint about the current requirement to...forums.freebsd.org
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/www/chromium}
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes
.endif
BATCH=yes
CPUTYPE?=alderlake
MTREE_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS= -L
OPENSSLBASE=/usr/local
WITHOUT_CCACHE_BUILD=yes
WITHOUT_MANCOMPRESS=yes
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= mysql=10.11m
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= java=17
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=openssl31
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= pgsql=16
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= php=8.2
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= nodejs=20
LICENSES_ACCEPTED+= HPLIP_PLUGIN bolthole NONE
Hmm..., there is nothing on freebsd-pkg-fallout@ or https://portsfallout.com for 140amd64-default regarding www/chromium.www/chromium failed (pictured).