I unfortunately dropped a piece of metal in the wrong spot on my motherboard which caused the computer to shutdown instantly.
Upon restarting the machine (TrueNAS Core 14 ) kernel would panic when it came to mounting my pool (12 disks, 2 zdev...
It's sort of a meaningless question. ZFS by default doesn't really care about how the files are distributed within the pool so long as the total doesn't exceed limits. It will keep track of how much is allocated to what and you won't really care...
Thank you, gotnull. That seems to work. It is SIGNIFICANTLY different than anything else I've read and thank you.
I'll need to experiment with it some more.
In that case, it might be worth reinstalling with ZFS if you have the means to shuffle the files. Having things like /tmp on the same filesystem as other things can increase the risk of corruption.
Loader.conf is before the kernel. /etc/rc is closer but it launches the configured programs in the rc.d multitasking/background construct that has no direct CLI I/O. Maybe between rc and login, still with all single-user permissions like root.
T-Aoki I actually have an EMS card in my XT, today.
EMS is a kind of pure PC(/XT) thing. With the 286 came XMS.
They're actually a same thing, interfaces provided by DOS drivers to equip possibility of mapping large amounts of RAM to real mode...
What I do is auto-login to a shell on the alt-F1 console and have the shell execute things if we are ttyv0 and we just booted according to the uptime command. I think there really should be an autoexec.bat style startup script that just runs...
Which can be confusing as there are redirect and nat options, just not routing ones. Which if I'm understanding things correctly, PF can stamp the right bits on the packet to be routed to the right place, just not establish the routing that the...
He could believe that a $DEITY made the Earth in 7 days for all I care. If his technical skills are up to scratch, he can still produce great results with a computer (just don't position him as head of the NHS or equivalent).
Interesting.
It seems the X.org maintainers themselves have been outright gatekeeping patches and improvements from contributors, for the past four years. Insane. Things make more sense now.
I’m really looking forward to this port.
I don't believe pkgbase was ever touted as being faster for installs (on it's face I don't believe it can be). It will (does?) have package sets so it might be approximately comparable and allow for more flexibility. Where it is meant to be...
Same. Very much doubt its specific to a driver and only fails for specific type of packet (DNS query).
Isn't it something super obvious? Typo in a firewall rule for example?
And I'd run tcpdump on the host's egress interface, just to verify...
I believe at some point freebsd-update is meant to be re-implemented to make use of pkgbase and as such would carry the boot environment functionality along with it. (hopefully I didn't imagine reading that but it's been a few months:)
Original article here.
Consider this when replying.
FreeBSD, The FreeBSD Foundation, and The FreeBSD Forums are not associated with the content of this article.
Original article here.
Consider this when replying.
FreeBSD, The FreeBSD Foundation, and The FreeBSD Forums are not associated with the content of this article.
To have a symbol attached to your permanence. Something to remind you of something that you always carry with you, like an extreme photo in a wallet type of thing.
I'm not into that kind of stuff, not 'politically' against, just not into it...
That's pretty, definitively, dead. If there's I/O issues for example you'll notice pings would still work, but you'd be unable to login with ssh. Parts that don't require disk access would continue to work, like the TCP/IP stack itself.
Anything...
You can wrap it in (...) and redirect to a file.
Of course that requires a read-write mounted filesystem. Maybe it is easiest to use a USB stick and mount it right there in the script.
Don't forget about the -x option, which might come in handy...
Thanks T-Daemon. Your CLI command is slightly different than what I've seen bandied about and different from what is described in the pkgbase manpage as well.
I'll experiment with it.
The links above reference a removed port, it's filesystems/lkl nowadays, not sysutils/fusefs-lkl.
That said, the port seems to checkout at a commit made in Jun 28, 2018 (git repository has no version tags; commit date is also referenced in the...
What filesystem is the host using? And what filesystem does the guest use?
How can you tell? Does it stop responding to the network, does it still ping? What about the console (vm console ...)?
I did as you suggested but nothing appeared. Maybe there was no write permission.
I'll try something else just to make sure.
Just trying again noticed that a message about 'read only file system' so rc.initdiskless is actually being executed...
Original article here.
Consider this when replying.
FreeBSD, The FreeBSD Foundation, and The FreeBSD Forums are not associated with the content of this article.
It is used in filesystems/automount.
I have amended the relevant code on my system but pkg upgrade pulls in a new version which continues to use lklfuse.
https://github.com/vermaden/automount/blob/master/README
line 41
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.