Stable enough for me on a couple of systems. Have not done any specific benchmarks so can't say anything on slower/worse, but it's fast enough and stable enough for my use.Can it be said that latest ZoL is stable as ZoF and not slower or worse in any way?
openzfs-2022082900_1 OpenZFS userland for FreeBSD
openzfs-kmod-2022082900 OpenZFS kernel module for FreeBSD
As Erichans says, 13.x is "ZoL", 12.x is "ZoF". Bootcode from 13.x should be able to boot 12.x pool, not sure if the other is true (if pool has not been zpool upgrade to 13.x I think should work)What is the status of ZoL - is it the default ZFS and what is the latest FreeBSD with native ZFS (ZoF)?
If you don't zpool upgrade, the pools will stay on 12.x. I believe that 13.x can boot and understand the 12.x pools.Is there a way to upgrade from 12.x to 13.x and keep ZoF, e.g. custom compilation?
because "older doesn't know about newer""zpool upgrade" can be dangerous.
Otherwise 14 kernel can boot 13 which can boot 12. There is always compatibility for "older.
Why would you want that?Is there a way to upgrade from 12.x to 13.x and keep ZoF, e.g. custom compilation with provided definition?
Only if you want to downgrade again (which is unsupported anyway), or share the pool with older operating system versions."zpool upgrade" can be dangerous.
I don't think so. You maybe able to find a thread here on forums when somebody posted a message that 13 would be moved to openzfs. I think it was discussed there.Is there a way to upgrade from 12.x to 13.x and keep ZoF, e.g. custom compilation with provided definition?
I mean, I wouldn't call it "rock-stable" if you have to qualify it with "as long as you don't have power outages". ZFS transactioned and CoW nature is supposed to make power outages a non-event.My bootloader is 14.
My kernel is 13.
Using openzfs & kmod.
As long as you don't have power outages it is rock-stable.
Is there a way to upgrade from 12.x to 13.x and keep ZoF, e.g. custom compilation with provided definition?