Greetings all,
as the tile says. The primary criterion is compatibility with FreeBSD in the sense of minimal dependence on the Linux framework, i.e., hald, ConsoleKit, PolicyKit, D-Bus, systemd, and the like.
Secondary criteria is good support for add-ons, e.g., file manager, terminal, and the like, again without a lot of dependencies or being part of a desktop environment with its (unnecessary) functionality.
All other, i.e., ease/complexity of configuration, memory footprint, tiling, etc. are tertiary.
My reasoning is that the above will ensure stability and future support.
I am aware of Lumina, however, I have read rather contradictory statements regarding its stability and usefulness. I am also unsure how it supports add-ons, which are not part of its plugin environment.
Kindest regards,
M
as the tile says. The primary criterion is compatibility with FreeBSD in the sense of minimal dependence on the Linux framework, i.e., hald, ConsoleKit, PolicyKit, D-Bus, systemd, and the like.
Secondary criteria is good support for add-ons, e.g., file manager, terminal, and the like, again without a lot of dependencies or being part of a desktop environment with its (unnecessary) functionality.
All other, i.e., ease/complexity of configuration, memory footprint, tiling, etc. are tertiary.
My reasoning is that the above will ensure stability and future support.
I am aware of Lumina, however, I have read rather contradictory statements regarding its stability and usefulness. I am also unsure how it supports add-ons, which are not part of its plugin environment.
Kindest regards,
M