I don't understand how an ipfilter patch also requires changes to a boot loader file.
Microsoft ruins everything. All bow to the will of Microsoft.may be due to Secure Boot.
That's not sufficient. It's a hypothesis only.![]()
Even in IT-business there should be something like dirt money.I feel very sarcastic today because after many years I had to install Windows
loader.efi is what actually loads the kernel. I'm not sure but the reason it was updated may be due to Secure Boot.
Just speculation adding to previous speculation - because source code doesn't change at all, only hashes of the loaded binaries which are not known until the build phase, when they may be inserted into the loader binary?Even if that is the reason, why is it only delivered via freebsd-update? Why is it not reflected in the svn revision?