Why does FreeBSD only support BMP and PCX splash screen images? For example, a transparent PNG image would look pretty cool with the boot loader output running behind it!
boot_mute="YES"
beastie_disable="YES"
autoboot_delay=0
#splash_bmp_load="YES"
#bitmap_load="YES"
#bitmap_name="/boot/freebsd.bmp"
NeatThere is actually splash working with vt(4) now.
I don't think I've seen that low resolution since my C-64 daysJust like the logo at the top of this webpage but low rez and jagged.
I get what you're saying but showing the company's logo during boot does show a certain level of professionalism. Even if it's just cosmetic.Because FreeBSD is a professional operating system.
I get what you're saying but showing the company's logo during boot does show a certain level of professionalism. Even if it's just cosmetic.
FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p11 (GENERIC) #0: Thu Jun 21 03:46:08 UTC 2018
Unauthorized Access Denied!!!
, ,
/( )\
\\ \\___ / /
/- _ `-/ ' !
(/\\/ \\ \\ /
/ / | ` \
O O ) / |
`-^--'`< '
(_.) _ ) /
`.___/` /
`-----' /
<----. __ / __ \\
<----|====O)))==) \\) /====
<----' `--' `.__,' \\
| |
\\ /
______( (_ / \\______
,' ,-----' | \\
`--{__________) \\/
I always liked the functionality but I would agree there are more pressing issues to resolve with vt(4) (like switching back/forth between X and console).
It seems so obvious, but no I haven't tried it. Good suggestion though, easy enough to test.Have you tried setting your VT console to the same resolution as X?
showing the company's logo during boot does show a certain level of professionalism. Even if it's just cosmetic.
Agreed. Splash screens show professionalism even if they offer nothing in terms of functionality. They should also be optional, not forced on users. Also agreed that there are probably more pressing issues to deal with![]()
beastie_disable="YES"
to /boot/loader.conf