Yes,Did you runfreebsd-upgrade install
twice?
freebsd-upgrade
told me to do so. ls -al /usr/lib/libkrb5*
show?dice@williscorto:~ % freebsd-version -uk
12.2-RELEASE
12.2-RELEASE
dice@williscorto:~ % ls -al /usr/lib/libkrb5*
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5660274 Oct 12 20:47 /usr/lib/libkrb5.a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13 Nov 8 16:30 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so -> libkrb5.so.11
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 519168 Nov 8 16:30 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.11
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5757774 Oct 12 20:47 /usr/lib/libkrb5_p.a
root@betsy:/usr/ports # ls -al /usr/lib/libkrb5*
/bin/ls: No match.
WITHOUT_KERBEROS=YES
make buildworld
way. But building the world fails on my two 12.2-RELEASE systems.That sounds very reasonable. I recently converted a 12-STABLE machine to 12.2-RELEASE so I could update it more easily. But I have always built a 'full' world, I never excluded anything.So I think that freebsd-update() did not find the Kerberos library and did not install them.
freebsd-update
, I'm used to build all from src. If you have problems it's maybe worth purging the whole directory and let the svn fetch all again. Note that updates are only available
if they are being built for the FreeBSD release and architecture being
used; in particular, the FreeBSD Security Team only builds updates for
releases shipped in binary form by the FreeBSD Release Engineering Team,
Definitely. But we're not really mixing here. The OP is trying to update a system in such a way he can use freebsd-update(8) from that point onward. I've done something similar many times before and it's not problem. But the process does require a "full" world build, without excluding any parts (src.conf(5)). Not being able to buildworld due to errors doesn't help getting thereFrom this I think you should really not mix-n-match src/bin updates.