Whoever selects the defaults for some of the packages needs a good clip across the head!
* nginx with no SSL support included by default.. why?
* powerdns with no mysql backend support enabled, but postgres is included by default and the postres client is installed (what the?? postgres??? really??? why enable postres, but deliberately not enable mysql support?)
* exim with no sa-exim or content scanner support enabled.
* php with no php-fpm...
I had to install a number of packages from ports because of this sillyness. Now pkg upgrade wants to upgrade those packages using silly defaults from the package. pkg upgrade also wants to reinstall (clobber) a package despite no version bump, simply because its compiled defaults differ..
classic example:
I think I will just stick with ports.. not happy at all.
* nginx with no SSL support included by default.. why?
* powerdns with no mysql backend support enabled, but postgres is included by default and the postres client is installed (what the?? postgres??? really??? why enable postres, but deliberately not enable mysql support?)
* exim with no sa-exim or content scanner support enabled.
* php with no php-fpm...
I had to install a number of packages from ports because of this sillyness. Now pkg upgrade wants to upgrade those packages using silly defaults from the package. pkg upgrade also wants to reinstall (clobber) a package despite no version bump, simply because its compiled defaults differ..
classic example:
Code:
root@core:/usr/ports/mail/dovecot2 # pkg upgrade
Updating repository catalogue
Upgrades have been requested for the following 2 packages:
Reinstalling exim-4.82 (options changed)
Reinstalling php55-5.5.8 (options changed)
I think I will just stick with ports.. not happy at all.