Power consumption

z662

z662

I wanted to know if there was a way to view how many watts your system is pulling at a given time. I am not interested in the maximum load that the power supply can handle, rather how many watts are being used. Thanks
 
I don't think you can get that from the OS level without a smart power supply or some kind of built-in power management board. I use a product called "Kill-A-Watt" that I was given by a vendor. It plugs in between the power cord and the wall and shows various stats about power usage. You can also pull this information from most smart UPS's via the USB/serial interface.
 
I've used a similar device to measure consumption. You plug that device into power socket and then your desktop into it.

By doing a lot of measuring I've discovered for x86 that is power consumption is proportional with cpu frequency and number of cores.

Power used is for CPU+motherboard (whthout hdd, which is 10W or less for e desktop hdd):
- AMD Geode 500 MHz, consumption 4W
- Via C4/7 1Ghz, 11W (double frequency, double consumption)
- Intel Atom N270 1.6 Ghz (single core) 25W
- Intel Atom 330 dual x 1.6 GHZ: 33W

A dual core E2200 (2x2Ghz): 48W in idle, 78W in load.

For a CPU used in mini itx boards or notebook, cpu consumption does not grow much in load vs idle. For a desktop CPU it is a big difference.

On a quad core in X window i have 100W, if I open Firefox and then lot of tabs with websites, I have sometimes 150W.

A game that also uses GPU and CPU is 100%, on a quad and a ordinary nvidia 8500 can consume 200W-220W.

Macs are very green, in idle (not standby!) the consumption is only 14W for a Mac Mini dual core (40W in load).

(That's because the OSX, somebody installed OSX on a dell laptop and battery now holds 4 hours instead of 3 hours with Vista.)

All I've told you including consumption for a Mac Mini is based on my measurements.

But do not take what I've said very strict. There can be differences.

For example motherboard with intel Atom made by intel, asus or msi have different consumption. (with few wats difference, which is alot).

Also I've measured two mobo with Atom, same type of motherboard with different power sources. One was consuming 41W and other 37W (intel atom 330 + 1 hdd)

All components were the same in both systems, only power source differs.

There are some UPS that have software that tells you power usage. I had one of those, but the power consumption is not precise. For a computer it told me it was consuming 14W and if I put the power metter to see how the ups consume, it show me 50W (and the ups battery was full).
 
Thanks a lot, that answers my question. I really just needed a ballpark figure. I am pleased to see that the load is really not that high at all....Unless you are gaming on a pretty intense game. I would have thought the numbers would have been much higher. Makes you wonder how many people that buy those kilowatt PSU's ever use more than 1/3 of the potential.
 
There's also the power consumption of the monitor.

A usual 19 inch TFT desktop monitor consume 45W.

One more thing: I've measured a computer with intel mobo and dual core and consumes 10W when is power off. A CRT 21 inch monitor powered off consume 30W (even the power button seems like to have 2 position on/off and it seems is not digital so you think that the power button is connected directly to power and is not controlling the monitor digitally.)

If you have many powered off computers but plugged in, you waste alot of power without any benefit.

A powered off TV can consume 35W.

All is relatively. You must measure yourself. A mobo with AMD cpu is not consuming any power, well that's what I've measured. That does not mean that Intel mobo consumes and mobos with AMD cpu does not consume. It all depends on manufacturers of those mobos, and motherboard type (I think).

Another thing: when you see a PC power source that has specs 400W, it should work with such load. In fact usualy the real power is 200 - 250W.

Some nvidia video cards require separate power (12V) and also require 450W of power souce (for entire system). Well some 450W as in manufacturer specs are not in fact 450W but like 250-300W, so those nvidia cards will not work.

Some computer shops that sell PC power sources nows what is the real power of a source. For a noname source when they advertise 600W, you usually get 400W (sometime worse).
 
You can check out this thread for some info on my atom build: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=11136

More specifically:

- Intel BOXD510MO Intel Atom D510 Intel NM10 Mini ITX Motherboard/CPU Combo
- 2GB of DDR2 800
- 750GB WDB HDD
- Scythe S-FLEX SFF21D 120mm
- Samsung cd/dvd burner
- APEX MI-008 Black Steel Mini-ITX Tower Computer Case

So far it's working great. It's super silent, I attached the 120mm fan to the mobo fan port, so it's not running at full power although I did specify it to run at 100% in the bios. Will plug it direct to molex for more air flow (it'll still run silent as in my HTPC). (have done that since then)

Have compiled basic things like apache and samba both without issue. I f'd up on perl (made some bad selections) so I undid that and started again without issues the second time around. Seems well enough to me. Comparing it to my 3 Ghz P4 with 2GB ram it's a tad bit slower, but it does seem that the dual cores with HT is working the best it can. Definitely boots up faster.

Using kill-a-watt these are the readings I have so far:
2 watts turned off
49 watts max during boot
37 watts idle

Most I've seen during operation is 39 watts. Will start moving files around and will keep an eye on it. (doesn't get past 39 watts with anything I've done including lots of compiling).

Oh and the reason I skipped the 4GB option is because it really doesn't need it. When I build the main box up again and host it from home it'll need more drives (something the d510 mobo's just can't provide easily at the moment).

But all in all, it's pretty awesome (space) and quick.
Click to expand...
 
I'm getting similar results with my mini-ITX Atom machine (D510MO, 3GB RAM).

These make a very nice alternative to the Mac Mini. I like OS X, but am becoming concerned about having my data in formats that are unique to apps designed for a proprietary OS. My mini is a Power PC machine, and Apple has abandoned support for that processor. I could either buy an Intel-based Mac and continue tracking the latest version of OS X, or I can cut my losses. So I'm gradually moving all my stuff over to FreeBSD and open-source applications.

Interesting data here in this thread. It looks like my LCD monitors are now my biggest power hogs. :P
 
It would be interesting to see power consumption on a dual core x2Ghz Mac Mini with FreeBSD.

I have to intel Atoms 330 (dual core 2x1.66Ghz), one with 1 GHz ram and hard one hard drive WD blue 160GB - 41 W consumption, the other system, same motherboard, a 320G WD blue, 2G RAM - 37W consumption. (The difference in power consuption 41W vs 37 is because of power sources, i've switched hard drives and I get the same consumption) The one with 41W in 100% cpu -> 44W, the one with 37W in 100% cpu is 41W maximum.
 
@overmind most usual TFT displays have an average power consumption of 25-45W. The bigger the more power consumption (most of the time). I have a 24" TFT display with a consumption of about 33W and a 19" TFT display with measured 25W.

>Intel Atom 330 dual x 1.6 GHZ: 33W

The latest one, D510 (dualcore/Intel D510MO desktopboard): 22W idle, about 30W under load
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top