Yeah, Adobe fonts are really nice.
They are a very good first choice if you quickly want select readable fonts without putting much effort in this topic.
I use the courier style for the shell and Vim.
Particulary for the use with a texteditor I only chose fonts where every character can be easily, clearly and undoubtfuly be distinguished from others.
Especially for coding I have no use for fonts where you need always a second closer look to not mix up O and 0, I and l, the brackets or so...
But of course there are many, many other very good fonts. There are also many websites, where you can buy additional fonts (or even get free ones), and maybe a couple of bucks could bring your favorite font on the screen; this just as a hint for you don't need to stick with the ones given by ports or pkg, which already provide way more than enough for the daily use (hard to imagine not find a very good usable one within them.)
As far as I grappled with this topic I daresay FreeBSD and X combined are capable to implement nearly all types of standard font formats - so it's just a question of requirement and effort to chose your perfect fonts. (And how to implement which, where... -> The handbook dedicates this topic not for no reason.)
Perhaps a theme for the forum.
...LARGE topic.
I doubt it would be a good idea to start a discussion about it as a forum's thread, because not every font is suitable for every purpose - which font would be usable
for you for what needs....
It also depends on the monitor (pixelshape and space) and the resolution you're using, your position and distance to the screen, if you's wearing glasses... also your monitor's contrast settings make a difference for the viewability/readability of videos/text/...
Besides that there is much more potential for collisions of personal tastes as about proficieny about what it's really all about in the end:
typesetting, readability of texts
You may start with fixed size and truetype fonts, which are not the only two categories you only need to distinguish fonts within the aspect of pure technical usage (terminal vs. desktop.)
You're also not done with distinguishing serif from sans-serif fonts. I'll bet at the latest then an emotional argument starts, because most today's users distinguish serif as "old fashioned = yuk!" and sans-serif as "cool, modern = must do", not aware of the fact that the serifs are created to increase readability of large texts, and sans-serif fonts are ment for headlines or narrow column's texts. (Just because anything is done a billion times wrong doesn't make it right.)
Somebody who's reading much is aware of reading longer textes set in sans-serif fonts is way more weary, tidying as reading the same in serif fonts.
Anybody saying "no, that's not true!" is not proving the opposite, but not reading much, really. ?
Typesetting including fonts is a real craftmanship developed over centuries, almost destroyed in less than 25 years by wordprocessors (MS Word, LibreOffice Writer, etc).
The user's very first attention and too much attendant effort while working with it is used up into typesetting instead of concentrating on writing the text first and format it
afterwards, thus lowering both productivity and quality of either.
Plus: MS Word and LibreOffice Writer etc. overstrain users with typesetting possibilties such as hundreds of fonts, sizes, colors.... nobody needs, nobody wants to see.
(Not every writer thinks about his readers. But writing a text for nobody to read is pointless.)
Plus: MS Word and LibreOffice Writer etc. are not even capable of producing a single barely usable typesetting anyhow.
Plus: Most users don't know shit about typesetting at all, but being forced to do it as the very first task at all, even without a single character written yet and without being told anything about typesetting at all... ?
Thus ending up in the armageddon of typesetting we observe today.
There actually are publishers not ashamed of themselves trying to sell books written completely in sans-serif without justified margins... un-freakin..!!1!!eleven!!!
...and not a few will disagree while not actually being even aware of what I'm talking about or where the actual problem really is... ??
Tip:
You may find Allin Cottrell's essay "Word Processors: Stupid and Inefficient" as pdf if you duckduckgoing4it.
It's really readable and very revealing.
For those who did not recognized it:
I emphasize what hroudr presumably initially ment to say:
"It's a good idea not to stick with the preconfigured fonts but to chose a good readable font, increasing the readability of text."
forums.freebsd.org
