I've created a custom bootable USB, which is used as a install media.
USB is completely UFS based.
I've plugged it into laptop and booted it.
After creating phys layout of HDD, I've setup UFS and ZFS on it, in a way where BASE is on UFS and ZFS is everything else (/usr/local, /home, ...)
Here I've set DESTDIR to HDD and started to compile src on USB and finally installed it to HDD.
Finally make.conf and src.conf are copied from USB onto HDD.
I'm puzzled with this:
USB amd64 8.1 /src/ compilation time: (UFS)
world: 25 min
kernel: 8 min
Now I boot into Laptop
Laptop amd64 8.1 /src/ compilation time: (UFS+ZFS+Geli)
world: 160 min
kernel: 45 min
Same /src/ make.conf src.conf and hardware!?
Is it because ZFS and UFS have been mixed or ... ?!
That is, ... if I would do all this again, but ditching UFS and making laptop ZFS+Geli only.
Would it fix this penalty performance issue?
CPU is core2duo T8300 and I have a 4GB RAM
USB is completely UFS based.
I've plugged it into laptop and booted it.
After creating phys layout of HDD, I've setup UFS and ZFS on it, in a way where BASE is on UFS and ZFS is everything else (/usr/local, /home, ...)
Here I've set DESTDIR to HDD and started to compile src on USB and finally installed it to HDD.
Finally make.conf and src.conf are copied from USB onto HDD.
I'm puzzled with this:
USB amd64 8.1 /src/ compilation time: (UFS)
world: 25 min
kernel: 8 min
Now I boot into Laptop
Laptop amd64 8.1 /src/ compilation time: (UFS+ZFS+Geli)
world: 160 min
kernel: 45 min
Same /src/ make.conf src.conf and hardware!?
Is it because ZFS and UFS have been mixed or ... ?!
That is, ... if I would do all this again, but ditching UFS and making laptop ZFS+Geli only.
Would it fix this penalty performance issue?
CPU is core2duo T8300 and I have a 4GB RAM