I have 10.1 installed on a Lenovo workstation, and so far it is working well. My question, though, is why the xorg-server is so old? It is 1.12.4, from over two years ago. I installed xorg with pkg, but looking at the xorg-server port tells me that I would not get a newer version by building the xorg port.
I ask because I tried installing FreeBSD 10.1 on a little Intel Atom machine that I built, and which is my primary machine, because I like the quiet, the coolness, and the low energy consumption. And it's fast enough for most of what I do, and when it isn't, I have faster, more power-hungry machines. That machine has integrated Intel graphics hardware. Linux works fine (Slackware 14.1). FreeBSD does not. I do not get the full 1920x1080 resolution. I suspect it's using the vga driver rather than the Intel driver, but I've seen this before on this machine with earlier versions of FreeBSD, and wasted a lot of time wrestling with it, trying to find an Intel driver that worked and getting the system configured to use it. I was not about to go down that rathole again, so I just restored the backup I'd done of the Slackware set prior to trying FreeBSD. (Yes, I could have gathered a lot more information, such as Xorg logs, before blowing away the install, but again, having already seen this turn into a big time-waster, I just decided to stick with Linux on this machine.)
I note that Slackware 14.1 is about a year old and Patrick is famously conservative in his approach, avoiding the latest-and-greatest in favor of proven stability. 14.1 supplies version 1.14.3 of the xorg server, about a year newer than that provided by FreeBSD 10.1.
I ask because I tried installing FreeBSD 10.1 on a little Intel Atom machine that I built, and which is my primary machine, because I like the quiet, the coolness, and the low energy consumption. And it's fast enough for most of what I do, and when it isn't, I have faster, more power-hungry machines. That machine has integrated Intel graphics hardware. Linux works fine (Slackware 14.1). FreeBSD does not. I do not get the full 1920x1080 resolution. I suspect it's using the vga driver rather than the Intel driver, but I've seen this before on this machine with earlier versions of FreeBSD, and wasted a lot of time wrestling with it, trying to find an Intel driver that worked and getting the system configured to use it. I was not about to go down that rathole again, so I just restored the backup I'd done of the Slackware set prior to trying FreeBSD. (Yes, I could have gathered a lot more information, such as Xorg logs, before blowing away the install, but again, having already seen this turn into a big time-waster, I just decided to stick with Linux on this machine.)
I note that Slackware 14.1 is about a year old and Patrick is famously conservative in his approach, avoiding the latest-and-greatest in favor of proven stability. 14.1 supplies version 1.14.3 of the xorg server, about a year newer than that provided by FreeBSD 10.1.