After
In /var/db/pkg/vuln.xml:
The port version installed here is
1.0.2j is less then 1.0.2k isn't it?
pkg audit -F the latest Openssl vulnerability is not recognized.In /var/db/pkg/vuln.xml:
Code:
<vuln vid="d455708a-e3d3-11e6-9940-b499baebfeaf">
<topic>OpenSSL -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
<affects>
<package>
<name>openssl</name>
<range><lt>1.0.2k</lt></range>
</package>
<package>
<name>openssl-devel</name>
<range><lt>1.1.0d</lt></range>
</package> </affects>
<description>
<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The OpenSSL project reports:</p>
<blockquote cite="https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170126.txt">
<ul>
<li>Truncated packet could crash via OOB read (CVE-2017-3731)<br/>
Severity: Moderate<br/>
If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific
cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client
to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash.</li>
<li>Bad (EC)DHE parameters cause a client crash (CVE-2017-3730)<br/>
Severity: Moderate<br/>
If a malicious server supplies bad parameters for a DHE or ECDHE key exchange
then this can result in the client attempting to dereference a NULL pointer
leading to a client crash. This could be exploited in a Denial of Service
attack.</li>
<li>BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on x86_64 (CVE-2017-3732)<br/>
Severity: Moderate<br/>
There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure. No
EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA
as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not
believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very
difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information
about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources
required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only
accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would
additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target
private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private
key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by
default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very
similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem.</li>
<li>Montgomery multiplication may produce incorrect results (CVE-2016-7055)<br/>
Severity: Low<br/>
There is a carry propagating bug in the Broadwell-specific Montgomery
multiplication procedure that handles input lengths divisible by, but
longer than 256 bits. (OpenSSL 1.0.2 only)<br/>
This issue was previously fixed in 1.1.0c</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</body>
</description>
<references>
<url>https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170126.txt</url>
<cvename>CVE-2016-7055</cvename>
<cvename>CVE-2017-3730</cvename>
<cvename>CVE-2017-3731</cvename>
<cvename>CVE-2017-3732</cvename>
</references>
<dates>
<discovery>2017-01-26</discovery>
<entry>2017-01-26</entry>
</dates>
</vuln>The port version installed here is
Code:
# openssl version
OpenSSL 1.0.2j 26 Sep 2016
# pkg audit
0 problem(s) in the installed packages found.1.0.2j is less then 1.0.2k isn't it?
