Hi folks,
I have a FreeBSD based NAT-box, which also serves as a WLAN AP. The home network has a file+print server, and my family has couple of desktops, 3 laptops and cellphones, which all connect to the LAN over either wired ethernet or over WLAN.
Currently the machine has 4 network cards:
NATting:
Ethernet 1: connected to my ISP over VDSL2 modem
Ethernet 2: connected to LAN
WLAN:
Ethernet 3: Bridged to WLAN 1
WLAN 1: Bridged to Ethernet 3
The idea is to make the WLAN devices behave like they were directly connected to the LAN, so they can access the file shares and printing which again isn't available on the other side of the NAT.
The question is, can I drop the 3rd Ethernet card, so the 2nd ethernet card would be used on both, NAT box's LAN connection and as a part of the WLAN bridge?
I'm asking this because the hardware is getting old, and I have my eyes on a nano-atx board that has room for 2 ethernet ports and a build-in WLAN, but no room for expansion, except if I buy a rather expensive PCI-E 2 port NIC.
I have a FreeBSD based NAT-box, which also serves as a WLAN AP. The home network has a file+print server, and my family has couple of desktops, 3 laptops and cellphones, which all connect to the LAN over either wired ethernet or over WLAN.
Currently the machine has 4 network cards:
NATting:
Ethernet 1: connected to my ISP over VDSL2 modem
Ethernet 2: connected to LAN
WLAN:
Ethernet 3: Bridged to WLAN 1
WLAN 1: Bridged to Ethernet 3
The idea is to make the WLAN devices behave like they were directly connected to the LAN, so they can access the file shares and printing which again isn't available on the other side of the NAT.
The question is, can I drop the 3rd Ethernet card, so the 2nd ethernet card would be used on both, NAT box's LAN connection and as a part of the WLAN bridge?
I'm asking this because the hardware is getting old, and I have my eyes on a nano-atx board that has room for 2 ethernet ports and a build-in WLAN, but no room for expansion, except if I buy a rather expensive PCI-E 2 port NIC.