Hi,
I just stumbled upon an lsof annoyance I want to report to the package maintainers. I'm just using pkg, no src and poudriere.
The annoyance is quite simple: FreeBSD is an OS which comes with ZFS enabled and shipped by default, but lsof gets compiled without ZFS support.
00FAQ clearly states this:
8.5 FreeBSD ZFS Problems
8.5.1 Why does FreeBSD lsof report "WARNING: no ZFS support has been
defined."?
Lsof issues that message when it detects a file on a ZFS file
system, but has not been built with support for ZFS. Lsof's
Configure script detects support can be added for ZFS when it
finds this file:
/usr/src/sys/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zfs_znode.h
So that's a compile time short coming. In my opinion lsof should be shipped with enabled ZFS support by default.
Is Bugzilla the way to go for reporting this?
Thanks!
I just stumbled upon an lsof annoyance I want to report to the package maintainers. I'm just using pkg, no src and poudriere.
The annoyance is quite simple: FreeBSD is an OS which comes with ZFS enabled and shipped by default, but lsof gets compiled without ZFS support.
Bash:
root@kraftwerk:/tmp # lsof | less
lsof: WARNING: no ZFS support has been defined.
See 00FAQ for more information.00FAQ clearly states this:
8.5 FreeBSD ZFS Problems
8.5.1 Why does FreeBSD lsof report "WARNING: no ZFS support has been
defined."?
Lsof issues that message when it detects a file on a ZFS file
system, but has not been built with support for ZFS. Lsof's
Configure script detects support can be added for ZFS when it
finds this file:
/usr/src/sys/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zfs_znode.h
So that's a compile time short coming. In my opinion lsof should be shipped with enabled ZFS support by default.
Is Bugzilla the way to go for reporting this?
Thanks!
