In the abovetitled configuration file I find this ruleset #4:
Now my questions:
1. Is it really necessary to have all jails have access to zfs control?
If I make another rule like the following, and add it to /etc/devfs.rules?
2. Would do such a rule do any damage to jails that do not do zfs themselves?
3. Which rule number(s) should I choose to be sure not to damage any systems where my script gets installed?
Code:
# Devices usually found in a jail.
#
[devfsrules_jail=4]
add include $devfsrules_hide_all
add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic
add include $devfsrules_unhide_login
add path zfs unhideNow my questions:
1. Is it really necessary to have all jails have access to zfs control?
If I make another rule like the following, and add it to /etc/devfs.rules?
Code:
[devfsrules_jail_without_zfs=1234321]
add include $devfsrules_hide_all
add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic
add include $devfsrules_unhide_login2. Would do such a rule do any damage to jails that do not do zfs themselves?
3. Which rule number(s) should I choose to be sure not to damage any systems where my script gets installed?