if youre not using tarot in your programming youre going to be left behind

[atax1a]

as you can clearly see, we asked the silicon dawn, and it said 6 of Wands

 

[eternal_noob]

View attachment 25446

Edit: Aaand gone.

 

[AlfredoLlaquet]

This is the best thread since Alain De Vos was discouraged by a bad person and stopped creating his amusing threads.

 

[AlfredoLlaquet]

I think tarot-coding has a lot of future. Every step of the way, you ask the cards: is it >= 0 or just > 0 in this loop? Should I create a class or just use functions? Should I use this library or that one?

 

[atax1a]

it's just so much more productive to be coding with a tarot deck by my side. my dev velocity has taken off like a rocket.

 

[AlfredoLlaquet]

Since I ask the tarot cards, I make no errors and all my coding is memory-safe without even trying!

 

[cracauer@]

This is the best thread since Alain De Vos was discouraged by a bad person and stopped creating his amusing threads.

I will make a hobby of bumping all Alain threads all the time. It's forum culture.

 

[mer]

I prefer this: https://magic-8ball.com/

 

[atax1a]

I prefer this: https://magic-8ball.com/

that's only a 20 parameter model! my tarot deck is a 99 parameter model, but we lost one, so it only has 98

 

[Crivens]

that's only a 20 parameter model! my tarot deck is a 99 parameter model, but we lost one, so it only has 98

So your coding is not tarot-complete. How do you deal with the cases that require that?

 

[fernandel]

I prefer this: https://magic-8ball.com/

I need to buy a lottery tickets because magic ball said: "YES"

 

[Espionage724]

The shell knows all

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv9vp5zngV8

 

[atax1a]

So your coding is not tarot-complete. How do you deal with the cases that require that?

we grab another deck. most of the rest of ours are full 78-card decks, it's the Silicon Dawn that's the outlier.

 

[DanielBowman]

Tarot coding is so yesterday news.
Chinese startup perfected the Reading of Tea Leafs Coding method.
RTLC is the meta, you fools.
Or you can try the free tier - it has something to do with stains on one's underwear. It was inspired by Rorschach method.

 

[atax1a]

bold of you to assume we wear underwear

 

[jbo@]

that's only a 20 parameter model! my tarot deck is a 99 parameter model, but we lost one, so it only has 98

How does one loose a tarot card? Sounds ominous.
I'm asking for a friend.

 

[AlfredoLlaquet]

Seriously, now, the most productive way of coding is licking-a-toad coding. You lick a toad; you code a little bit amongst colorful clouds and dancing syntax. When you regain your normal vision, you lick the toad again and repeat the process. PS: Please, don't lick any toad. They don't like it.

 

[Espionage724]

Seriously, now, the most productive way of coding is licking-a-toad coding. You lick a toad; you code a little bit amongst colorful clouds and dancing syntax. When you regain your normal vision, you lick the toad again and repeat the process. PS: Please, don't lick any toad. They don't like it.

Coding under the influence

Was there ever a hackathon or something like that?

 

[atax1a]

How does one loose a tarot card? Sounds ominous.
I'm asking for a friend.

we lost an entire deck in someone else's chaos field once!

 

[Charlie_]

Speaking of tarot, I read this book (translated version) a long time ago.

The Fool's Run

The first book in John Camp/Sandford's 'Kidd' series

www.johnsandford.org

https://www.amazon.com/Fools-Run-Kidd-John-Sandford/dp/0425155722

 

[Jose]

Coding under the influence

Was there ever a hackathon or something like that?

Obligatory XKCD:

Ballmer Peak

xkcd.com