Even if I've never tried it, I'm happy about that.
I'm just wondering why DesktopBSD and PCBSD are both using KDE.
Could it be somehow counterproductive?
I think that their target user are desktop user. I know that they have peculiar features but I'm wondering if they are somehow stepping on their feet and not reaching users which don't like KDE.
-different goals in the past (no PBIs for DesktopBSD and as close as possible to FreeBSD)
-DesktopBSD was first
-Gnome was more or less a pain in the backside to support in the past; today it's a different story thanks to Miwi and others
-furthermore Peter likes KDE ;-)
>Wasn't it already a one man army in the past?
Yes. I was in the team but for user support, tests, PR, the wiki etc. together with Daniel Seuffert. But Peter did the development on its own.