My question is inspired by the fact that ftp.freebsd.org is listed in the list of projects that still use vsftpd
I like the old school style of FTP and would like to use it to give access to a wide range of users of my server. Here I mean read-only anonymous access without any TLS. Just using FreeBSD, Jails and vsftpd.
I need to provide quite heavy files to users, including virtual machines and ZFS snapshots (obtained by zfs send -R zpool/test@test > test.zfs). These are files ranging in size from 30Gb to perhaps 120Gb or even more. I'd like to support ftp even though I give HTTPS access to the same directory on server.
Unfortunately, in the above list there are fewer and fewer hosts that support FTP. Not only are they unavailable, but, as far as I can see, the A-record in the DNS zone for ftp is already missing. Of the most famous working hosts, I can list:
ftp.freebsd.org
ftp.suse.com
ftp.redhat.com
ftp.gnu.org
1 - Since ftp.freebsd.org is on this list, may I have your reasons why this protocol is being supported? Is this done for completeness of the protocols?
2 - What about accusations about FTP being vulnerable to attacks like MITM and others?
3 - What are your future plans for FTP?
I like the old school style of FTP and would like to use it to give access to a wide range of users of my server. Here I mean read-only anonymous access without any TLS. Just using FreeBSD, Jails and vsftpd.
I need to provide quite heavy files to users, including virtual machines and ZFS snapshots (obtained by zfs send -R zpool/test@test > test.zfs). These are files ranging in size from 30Gb to perhaps 120Gb or even more. I'd like to support ftp even though I give HTTPS access to the same directory on server.
Unfortunately, in the above list there are fewer and fewer hosts that support FTP. Not only are they unavailable, but, as far as I can see, the A-record in the DNS zone for ftp is already missing. Of the most famous working hosts, I can list:
ftp.freebsd.org
ftp.suse.com
ftp.redhat.com
ftp.gnu.org
1 - Since ftp.freebsd.org is on this list, may I have your reasons why this protocol is being supported? Is this done for completeness of the protocols?
2 - What about accusations about FTP being vulnerable to attacks like MITM and others?
3 - What are your future plans for FTP?