Unless I had a bad SSH connection which is not likely... I apologize that I have no time to go into complete details. I must warn you guys or else it goes unknown.
I have two drives of the same size that I installed FreeBSD 9.2 and the other FreeBSD 10.0. FreeBSD 9.2 works with out a problem but when I installed FreeBSD 10..0 with the same size slices, SVN checkout for source halted at
So I did ...
... come to find out that my root partition (sized of 1541MB) is overfilled ... with -49 availability. There is no excuse! The same size of slices are on both hard drives. The FreeBSD 9.2 (using the same steps) install has 976 MB available space left. There is no excuse!
Please correct formatting of this thread. You can adjust as needed. I work 12 hours per day and I took off the past three days for 9.2 but ended up falling in love with 10.0 release notes, but 10.0 fail, big-time!
My guess is Subversion for 10.0 has fixed one thing (adding etc files and another folder to an empty src when installing the Subversion to ports that I got from portsnap() .... but Subversion messed up another thing
... no big deal I’m just glad I caught it in time,
I hope the developers will figure the rest for themselves and fix it. I’m here FreeBSD as a max-future-user even if I got to go back to 8.2 so that I can learn and stop trying to keep up with the Jones.
Right or wrong, the point are the steps that I took for each install. EXACTLY the same.
Please save FreeBSD 10.0 and never dump FreeBSD-9x or even at lease 8x for FreeBSD sake!
This experience makes me think about Windows XP... Everything up to Win-8.1 is for the ill-minded or the next generation (our kids) who will never see the common since of what a true operating system has to offer (that’s why FreeBSD keeps GNOME, Thank GOD!). Unless you are too to young to see the truth I just say, have a nice day, but please don’t let that happen to FreeBSD.
SVN for FreeBSD will win I hope.
Time running out. Have a nice day.
I have two drives of the same size that I installed FreeBSD 9.2 and the other FreeBSD 10.0. FreeBSD 9.2 works with out a problem but when I installed FreeBSD 10..0 with the same size slices, SVN checkout for source halted at
Code:
svn: E200030: sqlite[s13]: database or disk is full
So I did ...
Code:
df -m
... come to find out that my root partition (sized of 1541MB) is overfilled ... with -49 availability. There is no excuse! The same size of slices are on both hard drives. The FreeBSD 9.2 (using the same steps) install has 976 MB available space left. There is no excuse!
Please correct formatting of this thread. You can adjust as needed. I work 12 hours per day and I took off the past three days for 9.2 but ended up falling in love with 10.0 release notes, but 10.0 fail, big-time!
My guess is Subversion for 10.0 has fixed one thing (adding etc files and another folder to an empty src when installing the Subversion to ports that I got from portsnap() .... but Subversion messed up another thing
I hope the developers will figure the rest for themselves and fix it. I’m here FreeBSD as a max-future-user even if I got to go back to 8.2 so that I can learn and stop trying to keep up with the Jones.
Right or wrong, the point are the steps that I took for each install. EXACTLY the same.
Please save FreeBSD 10.0 and never dump FreeBSD-9x or even at lease 8x for FreeBSD sake!
This experience makes me think about Windows XP... Everything up to Win-8.1 is for the ill-minded or the next generation (our kids) who will never see the common since of what a true operating system has to offer (that’s why FreeBSD keeps GNOME, Thank GOD!). Unless you are too to young to see the truth I just say, have a nice day, but please don’t let that happen to FreeBSD.
SVN for FreeBSD will win I hope.
Time running out. Have a nice day.