I can't help but feel like I'm missing something here. Following all the steps in https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-wireless.html, with an Atheros AR9485 card, I've worked my way backwards towards the simplest possible configuration, trying to rule everything out.
I started with a WPA2-PSK setup with wpa_supplicant, and a static IP address. I reconfigured my networking hardware for DHCP, took out the encryption, and adjusted the corresponding settings in FreeBSD accordingly for troubleshooting purposes, as per the FreeBSD manual reading
I've gone back to an open, non-secure configuration for troubleshooting purposes. One thing that keeps popping up when using ping to troubleshoot "No route to host", except when pinging the address under the inet section under wlan0. defaultrouter="*.*.*.*" is set in rc.conf, but I'll just get a "No route to host" error if I ping that, unless my wired connection is plugged in.
I'm getting the impression that the my wlan is looking for a different route than my wired connection, but i cannot find anywhere that says that should be the case.
Some information:
My wireless portion of my ifconfig reads:
Settings in /etc/rc.conf that have changed since I started trying to set up wireless:
Settings in /boot/loader.conf that have changed:
My router gives me a table for monitoring network traffic. Here's what passes through on boot or initialization of the device.
no RX packets, 1 TX packet with a byte size of 356 RX and 361 TX, no dropped, no errors, 2 Multicast, 0 Collisions.
I started with a WPA2-PSK setup with wpa_supplicant, and a static IP address. I reconfigured my networking hardware for DHCP, took out the encryption, and adjusted the corresponding settings in FreeBSD accordingly for troubleshooting purposes, as per the FreeBSD manual reading
Simplify the configuration as much as possible. If using a security protocol such as WPA or WEP, configure the access point for open authentication and no security to see if traffic will pass.
I've gone back to an open, non-secure configuration for troubleshooting purposes. One thing that keeps popping up when using ping to troubleshoot "No route to host", except when pinging the address under the inet section under wlan0. defaultrouter="*.*.*.*" is set in rc.conf, but I'll just get a "No route to host" error if I ping that, unless my wired connection is plugged in.
I'm getting the impression that the my wlan is looking for a different route than my wired connection, but i cannot find anywhere that says that should be the case.
Some information:
My wireless portion of my ifconfig reads:
Code:
aht0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 2290
ether my mac id
nd6 options=21<PERFORMUND,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11ng
status: associated
wlan0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
ether my mac id
inet my DHCP lease netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast my dhcp lease.255
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet MCS mode 11ng
status: associated
ssid my ssid channel 1 (2412 MHZ 11g ht/20) bssid my routers mac(except the last 2 are b2 instead of ae
regdomain 96 indoor ecm authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 20 bmiss 7
scanvalid 60 protmode CTS ampdulimit 64k ampdudensity 8 shortgi wme
burst
Settings in /etc/rc.conf that have changed since I started trying to set up wireless:
Code:
wlans_ath0="wlan0"
ifconfig_wlan0="DHCP"
Settings in /boot/loader.conf that have changed:
Code:
if_ath_load="YES"
if_ath_pci_load="YES"
wlan_wep_load="YES"
wlan_ccmp_load_"YES"
wlan_tkip_load="YES"
My router gives me a table for monitoring network traffic. Here's what passes through on boot or initialization of the device.
no RX packets, 1 TX packet with a byte size of 356 RX and 361 TX, no dropped, no errors, 2 Multicast, 0 Collisions.