For a while I was told that me reusing my old stuff was actually less energy efficient than disposing of it and buying new (i.e more efficient hardware. etc).
However it turns out that my old kit would just be shipped off to other countries and they would end up using the inefficient hardware instead. Sure their electricity costs are likely lower but cheap costs doesn't mean less coal is being burned.
Its a hard one because the "best" solution for the environment is very weak thin clients connecting to a large central server farm where efficiency due to large numbers can be attained. However... I refuse to do that until those server farms are not run by criminals.
My solution is to ship off all my old shite to my cousins living in Danmark where a higher percentage of energy is from wind power. Yes, they keep asking me not to and telling me they don't want any more of my old crap... But I just ignore them. Saving the planet is all about making a compromise! XD
I think letting them have something in return at least is only fair![]()
For computation and storage/IO, that is the correct answer. That's because both the CPUs and disk drives in very large server farms are more efficient. Why? Two reasons. By sharing many workloads, they are kept continuously busy, so they don't have the power inefficiency of being idle. Second: for amateurishly built servers and individual desktop clients, about half the energy is wasted for cooling and power consumption (for every Watt that CPU or disk uses, you need nearly a second Watt to remove the heat, or to convert the power from the wall outlet into the various DC voltages the chips and disk use. In contrast, the big data centers typically have that overhead at 10-20%, so they are nearly twice as power efficient (1.2 compared to 2). Cooling and power conversion is a giant science, with research conferences, magazines (I get "electronics cooling" in the mail), and the big cloud companies have literally staff of hundreds working on optimizing that.Its a hard one because the "best" solution for the environment is very weak thin clients connecting to a large central server farm where efficiency due to large numbers can be attained.
I use the wisdom from the wiki, dpms(4) (what could be done to reduce energy consumption, data usage in bsd? [...]
ServerArguments=dpms -nolisten tcp
in sddm.conf(5)) & aggressive settings for powerd(8): sysrc powerd_flags="-a adp -n adp -i 70 -r 95"
to scale the frequency down quickly, although I learned that the C-states switching saves much more energy than frequency scaling ( sysrc economy_cx_lowest="Cmax"
, same for performance_cx_lowest
). Also note sysutils/gstopd & suspend to disk aka hibernation; when reasonable, I suspend my laptop, then after another 15 minutes it suspends to disk.Well, you're doing already: whenever you use the internet... IIRC the vast majority of energy consumption of computers is through network equipment & internet server farms/plants. Compared to today's servers, even advanced gamer PCs are thin clients. Yesterday, a friend told me he's configuring a server with 3 TB of RAM... ? (not in the whole rack, but in a single 2" enclosure). Just try to guess how much energy a simple search via one of the usual internet search engines consumes.[...] Its a hard one because the "best" solution for the environment is very weak thin clients connecting to a large central server farm where efficiency due to large numbers can be attained. However... I refuse to do that until those server farms are not run by criminals .
It's not gentleman-like to ignore your cousin's wish... + the energy used by shipment... Their local garbage disposal service should charge you a fee. Please keep in mind that electronic waste is hazardous waste. You'd better donate it to a local computer recycle/reuse organisation or company.My solution is to ship off all my old shite to my cousins living in Danmark where a higher percentage of energy is from wind power. Yes, they keep asking me not to and telling me they don't want any more of my old crap... But I just ignore them. Saving the planet is all about making a compromise! XD
So use a laptop where hardware, OS and user-level software have all been designed by a single company, with the goal if increasing battery life.
As mentioned I don't trust they will dispose of it. They will end up selling it to some guy in a foreign country where he will use it and consume the same amount of energy as if I just kept using it myselfYou'd better donate it to a local computer recycle/reuse organisation or company.
Like I documented in the howto mentioned above. I manually suspend to RAM (Does suspend-to-disk work for you? How??
zzz
or via GUI), wait 15 minutes (UEFI/BIOS knob [0min...1h?]), then it suspends to disk via UEFI/BIOS methods (no OS involved). On battery, suspend is configured to happen automagically If it's not too old, usually they will refurbish it (or tinker 4 from 5 old) & sell it in a country where they can get the best price. E.g. ReUse-Computer.org (german). IIRC, it is forbidden to send non-working electronic hardware outside of the EU; it must be declared as electronic waste and then strict rules apply. But I don't believe that is monitored/controled; our old stuff still goes to western Africa to let the modern slaves recycle the copper, gold, rare earth elements etc.As mentioned I don't trust they will dispose of it. They will end up selling it to some guy in a foreign country where he will use it and consume the same amount of energy as if I just kept using it myself.
I suppose I could purposely smash the components but I never have been one to enjoy dismantling LEGO. Every bone in my body just wants to keep on finding a use for it, even if that apparently is wasteful.
If it's not too old, usually they will refurbish it (or tinker 4 from 5 old) & sell it in a country where they can get the best price. E.g. ReUse-Computer.org (german). IIRC, it is forbidden to send non-working electronic hardware outside of the EU; it must be declared as electronic waste and then strict rules apply. But I don't believe that is monitored/controled; our old stuff still goes to western Africa to let the modern slaves recycle the copper, gold, rare earth elements etc.
I think this is even the Xorg default setting.
Maybe, but it does not work without the kernel module:[...] Conversely, most FreeBSD users (including myself) seem to prefer to use the DPMS screen saver that switches the screen off after <n> minutes of inactivity. I think this is even the Xorg default setting. I have no idea why.
grep -i dpms /var/log/Xorg.0.log{,.old} | less
/var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 39.466] (II) intel(0): No DPMS capabilities specified
/var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 39.639] (**) intel(0): DPMS enabled
/var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 39.688] (II) Initializing extension DPMS
sysrc kld_list+=" dpms"
As an individual user on a laptop, you are not using enough power to make a dent in the universe. The article states a laptop at full speed is using around 40W of power. A 20% decrease in that is 8Watts and I'm betting you couldn't achieve that without sacrifice.
One thing I find disturbing about this forum is the number of religious extremists, who seem to be mostly spouting nonsensical statements that reflect their irrational hatred for other OSes.
Not a good basis for making technical decisions on.
One thing I find disturbing about this forum is the number of religious extremists, who seem to be mostly spouting nonsensical statements that reflect their irrational hatred for other OSes. Not a good basis for making technical decisions on.