Double definition of bind_socket in worker-controller.inc (rspamd)?

[sidney2017]

Hi,

If you search the WWW for worker-controller.inc, you will find numerous excerpts from worker-controller.inc.

What I don't understand: In almost all descriptions of worker-controller.inc on the WWW bind_socket is defined twice, which makes little sense, since presumably the last definition wins.

# dovecot will use this socket to communicate with rspamd
# note to self - tighten up these permissions
bind_socket = "/var/run/rspamd/rspamd.sock mode=0666 owner=nobody";

# you can comment this out if you don't need the web interface (statistics, etc)
bind_socket = "127.0.0.1:11334";

Given the descriptions of worker-controller.inc above, I wonder what you have to do actual if you use both Dovecot AND want to use the rspamd GUI?

Thanks in advance
Sidney2017

 

[SirDice]

What I don't understand: In almost all descriptions of worker-controller.inc on the WWW bind_socket is defined twice, which makes little sense, since presumably the last definition wins.

You can specify multiple bind_socket options to listen on as many addresses as you want.

Workers documentation

Details about worker processes, their configuration and management in Rspamd.

rspamd.com