Hello everyone,
I'm looking to improve the manageability, IMO, of ports. However, I'm in need of advises to overcome some challenges I'm encountering.
This tool gives a very nice tree view. Since you could have different (poudriere) 'sets' and make.conf file(s), this manual usage becomes troublesome and tedious:
Is it possible to specify the 'make.conf' file similar KERNCONF and options location instead of default /var/db/ports?
In short, I'm looking for a way to spot the issue before it's reported during compilation like this.
Thanks.
[edit] Looks like that tree tool only provides view of the installed ports. So it seems that I'll need to parse the recursion of
I'm looking to improve the manageability, IMO, of ports. However, I'm in need of advises to overcome some challenges I'm encountering.
This tool gives a very nice tree view. Since you could have different (poudriere) 'sets' and make.conf file(s), this manual usage becomes troublesome and tedious:
- setting the appropriate config to match poudriere
- make.conf file(s)
- OPTIONS
- reverting to desired main default state
- prone to errors or incorrect information when you have more than 20 (main) ports to build with different sets (options)
poudriere jail
command doesn't support make.conf and sets like poudriere bulk
. Thus, I'm unable to leverage jexec
.Is it possible to specify the 'make.conf' file similar KERNCONF and options location instead of default /var/db/ports?
In short, I'm looking for a way to spot the issue before it's reported during compilation like this.
Thanks.
[edit] Looks like that tree tool only provides view of the installed ports. So it seems that I'll need to parse the recursion of
make all-depends-list
.