Due to a recent change in the default options on the graphics/gdal port, I can no longer use the binary package management system for as many packages as I'd like to. With my current flock of 10ish VMs (Azure) being easy enough to take care of with pkg, I've kept the idea of a more advanced package management system as a worst-case scenario for down the road. The graphics/gdal change puts that point in the road now.
What is the currently accepted best practice for maintaining packages across multiple machines?
My use case is 1 development vm which tracks main on ports, and then a production environment which consists of two different machine templates: web+app servers, and postgres+postgis+zfs servers. Everything except the dev vm has used pkg quarterly or latest up to now.
I had begun to believe it was ports-mgmt/synth, but first impressions are leaving me wondering if there's a better choice?
What is the currently accepted best practice for maintaining packages across multiple machines?
My use case is 1 development vm which tracks main on ports, and then a production environment which consists of two different machine templates: web+app servers, and postgres+postgis+zfs servers. Everything except the dev vm has used pkg quarterly or latest up to now.
I had begun to believe it was ports-mgmt/synth, but first impressions are leaving me wondering if there's a better choice?