H h3z Feb 8, 2013 #1 Which assembler is best suited for most situations ? Is there another ? Or does it matter ?
graudeejs Feb 9, 2013 #2 Personally I prefer FASM, it's great. But it all depends what do you want to do. P.S. I love A86 assemblers syntax, too bad it's unmaintained (at least it looks like that) Windows/DOS only binary blob.
Personally I prefer FASM, it's great. But it all depends what do you want to do. P.S. I love A86 assemblers syntax, too bad it's unmaintained (at least it looks like that) Windows/DOS only binary blob.
graudeejs Feb 9, 2013 #3 the advantage of AS (If I remember correctly) is that it can read C header files
OP H h3z Feb 9, 2013 Thread Starter #4 graudeejs said: Personally I prefer FASM, it's great. But it all depends what do you want to do. P.S. I love A86 assemblers syntax, too bad it's unmaintained (at least it looks like that) Windows/DOS only binary blob. Click to expand... How could I forget FASM ? Thanks
graudeejs said: Personally I prefer FASM, it's great. But it all depends what do you want to do. P.S. I love A86 assemblers syntax, too bad it's unmaintained (at least it looks like that) Windows/DOS only binary blob. Click to expand... How could I forget FASM ? Thanks
