rigoletto@
Developer
I just saw ALAC (Apple Lossless Audio Codec) is Apache-2.0 licensed.
Anyone with technical knowledge could say something about the ALAC implementation vs FLAC? I mean there is something in ALAC which can make that potentially a "better" option than FLAC?
The last time I saw the ALAC implementation allowed a "high-res" recording to be encoded to ALAC, lossless, but not the other way around. I mean, 192/24 ALAC would be truncated to 16bits if converted back to WAV or AIFF for instance.
Thanks!
Anyone with technical knowledge could say something about the ALAC implementation vs FLAC? I mean there is something in ALAC which can make that potentially a "better" option than FLAC?
The last time I saw the ALAC implementation allowed a "high-res" recording to be encoded to ALAC, lossless, but not the other way around. I mean, 192/24 ALAC would be truncated to 16bits if converted back to WAV or AIFF for instance.
Thanks!