For example, in tcsh, `ls -R .` can't be written as `ls . -R`.
I think `ls . -R` is better, some reasons:
1. parameters makes sense when the object that the command operats on is determined first.
2. In practice, for a newbie, if I have to type the parameters first, I may forget the object (path name for ls) after do a complicated combinaton of paramters, and have to reference the object again.
If parameters come first, what are the benifits?
I think `ls . -R` is better, some reasons:
1. parameters makes sense when the object that the command operats on is determined first.
2. In practice, for a newbie, if I have to type the parameters first, I may forget the object (path name for ls) after do a complicated combinaton of paramters, and have to reference the object again.
If parameters come first, what are the benifits?