Hi,
I know this gets over done, but I think I have an interesting case study. I've done a little reading and understand that the reported FRAG number is more about free space fragmentation and is not generally a concern. The only "fix" I can find for high fragmentation is to copy the data off, recreate the pool and copy back.
I have just created a brand new pool and done nothing but
I know it's way too full and I will be moving quite a bit off it, but the FRAG increased quite quickly as I filled the pool. It was at 40% FRAG when only 80% full.
Is this expected behavior?
I know this gets over done, but I think I have an interesting case study. I've done a little reading and understand that the reported FRAG number is more about free space fragmentation and is not generally a concern. The only "fix" I can find for high fragmentation is to copy the data off, recreate the pool and copy back.
I have just created a brand new pool and done nothing but
zfs send/receive
three filesystems onto it and I have:
Code:
# zpool list jbod
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE FRAG EXPANDSZ CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
jbod 7.25T 6.71T 549G 55% - 92% 1.00x ONLINE -
I know it's way too full and I will be moving quite a bit off it, but the FRAG increased quite quickly as I filled the pool. It was at 40% FRAG when only 80% full.
Is this expected behavior?