pf-firewall

Hello there. I've completed setting my mail server up. Just for the sake of security and connection stability, I tried to implement PF firewall as well, for my services. Before I proceed and move my mail server into production, could someone please take a quick look at my pf.conf file and give...

I am announcing an IPv6 prefix via OSPF (bird2) to some routers, from the routers I can reach/ping the FreeBSD server, but I not from the internet: (internet) | | R1 --------- R2 \ / FreeBSD I am peering the node via wireguard using link-local and if I...

Named starts on a FreeBSD 13.1 release desktop, apache24 It works! but I have this error: named status /etc/rc.conf: Set: not found /etc/rc.conf: Set: not found named is running as pid xxx. Relevant entries in my /etc/rc.conf syslogd_flags="-ss -vv" sendmail_enable="NONE" ... etc...

Hi all, can anyone tell me what's wrong in line 26? I get the mentioned error when starting pf: pf.conf:26: rule expands to no valid combination I used this config for years and now migrated from digital ocean to AWS with FreeBSD 13.1 Every hint appreciated. Kind regards, Martin 1 # Set...

In terms of PF rules (enabled, actively running in my VPS), which way is the best way to allow a DHCP server (of my VPS provider) connect&define an IP to my VPS without any prevention? 1- pass quick proto udp from any to 255.255.255.255 or 2- pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto udp from any...

Under FreeBSD 13, I'm using PF and it was working fine till today. I've a <whitelist> table that I suspect it's not really working with PF. Any IPs within that file (table <whitelist> persist file "/var/pf/whitelist.txt") seems still getting blocked by PF, as I see through real-time by the...

From https://www.haproxy.org/ in the Reliability section I found: What set of tests/pf rules can be used to benchmark this? I am using the latest HAProxy 2.4 & PF under FreeBSD amd64 and so far working fine, but I would like to know if there is something I could consider of fine-tuning either...

Hello, I would like to send port 80 and 443 traffic out one interface while all other traffic goes via another. Specifically, I'd like all 80 and 443 traffic to go out the wifi interface while all other traffic goes out the wired ethernet interface. I tried various filtering rules to no avail...

I saw in this status report about: Ethernet support for pf pf syncookie support and would like to clarify: Isn't pf develped by OpenBSD? And if so, would these be the same development for pf in OpenBSD and these same features would make its way into OpenBSD as well? And if not, pf for...