1. sidetone

    Trying to understand compatibility details among: MPL 2.0, Apache 2.0, LGPL and GPL

    Apache 2.0 isn't compatible with GPL2, because of patent and infringement differences. LGPL2 also has mention of these terms, so I don't expect Apache 2.0 to compatible with it either. Apache 2.0 is determined compatible with GPL3. Of note, LGPL3 doesn't have mention of infringement and patents...
  2. rigoletto@

    'Dæmon License': an anti-viral license.

    The objective of the 'Dæmon License' is to create a license completely and clearly incompatible, directly and indirectly, with the COPYLEFT philosophy. Beyond personal convictions, a possible use would be for the corporation XYZ willing to open some random code to be improved community-wise but...