Search results

Works fine on Win2012 host, only a bug on 2008r2.

According to 10.1-RELEASE dmesg: ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: <Virtual HD 1.1.0> ATA-8 device ada0: 16.700MB/s transfers (WDMA2, PIO 65536bytes) ada0: 20479MB (41942880 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada0: Previously was known as ad0 da0 at blkvsc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0...

I am already use /dev/daX in 10.1 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p17 #0 r286840M /dev/da0p3 on / (ufs, local, journaled soft-updates)

Same here. All daX devices size is 0MB !!! FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE guest, Hyper-V on 2008 Host.

Same here after upgrade from 10.0-RELEASE to 10.1-RC1 # netstat -rnF 1 Routing tables (fib: 1) netstat: sysctl: net.route.0.0.dump.1: Cannot allocate memory It works while using setfib 1 netstat -rn. Reported to bugzilla, https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_ ... ?id=194217

Re: ipfw not matching decapsulated ipsec traffic patch for 10.0-RELEASE src diff -urN sys/netinet/ip_var.h /tmp/sys/netinet/ip_var.h --- sys/netinet/ip_var.h 2014-02-24 04:12:49.000000000 +0000 +++ /tmp/sys/netinet/ip_var.h 2014-02-24 05:14:23.000000000 +0000 @@ -163,12 +163,10 @@...

Re: ipfw not matching decapsulated ipsec traffic What about for 10.0-RELEASE? The patch can not compiled with 10.0-RELEASE src, M_SKIP_FIREWALL redefined.

Re: ipfw not matching decapsulated ipsec traffic Same here. After I upgraded to 10.0-RELEASE, pf, ipfw cannot control or NAT over ipsec tunnel. I tried set net.inet.ipsec.filtertunnel=1, or remove IPSEC_NAT_T, not work. Before upgrade, FreeBSd 9.2 works fine.

I have never made finckin work. I have to NAT protocol GRE by IPFW instead of PF. As my post on pfSense forum, http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=46172.0, you can try it. ipfw enable in-kernel nat, kernel conf: options LIBALIAS options IPFIREWALL_NAT or load module, kldload libalias...

Add a rule for you decide to ban IPs: ipfw add deny ip4 from table(1) to me in via $ext_if Pipe your IPs to insert into the IPFW table: ipfw table 1 add $ip

Well, I use fwd instead of divert: ipfw add fwd 10.0.1.1 ip from 10.0.1.2 to any via $nic1

Hi I set[]up multiple routing tables with setfib for two NICs. $nic1: 10.0.0.2/24, defaultrouter=10.0.0.1, fib=0 $nic2: 10.0.1.2/24, setfib 1 route add default 10.0.1.1 ipfw add 1000 setfib 1 ip from any to any via $nic2 ipfw add 2000 setfib 0 ip from any to any via $nic1 If I access services...

It bug from 9.1 beta. Crash on kernel booting. panic: CPU0 does not support X87 or SSE: 1

Hi all I setup 2 networks connected with gif tunnel. network1(172.16.0.0/24)<->server1(172.16.0.254)<-gif->server2(10.0.0.254)<->network2(10.0.0.0/24) Servers are running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE. If I only setup ipip tunnel without IPSEC, the traceroute works correctly. Proper result of traceroute...

Thanks kisscool-fr. According to your tips, now I solved this problem. I changed to use net/portfwd to prevent nc fork from inetd always.

I have read that article, that's for openbsd OpeBSD, not freebsd FreeBSD. There is no syntax about rdr-to, received-on or nat-to in freebsd FreeBSD's pf. The problem also called NAT loopback, there is a solution for other firewalls, I hope freebsd FreeBSD pf can do it.

Hi, I am using PF for NAT. There is a https server in the internal network, IP 172.16.0.250, I need port forward to make any internet user to access it. With pf rule, rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 443 -> 172.16.0.250 It only works for an internet user outside NAT...

I also request that.

There is not only one file patched

That patch is not only for usr.sbin/arp/arp.c, maybe you need to rebuld kernel too.